Skip to content

Comparison of Innovative Suture with Conventional Suture on Severity of Complications Following Mandibular fully Impacted third molar Surgery

Comparison of newly Presented Suturing technique with Conventional Suturing on Severity of Complications Following Mandibular fully Impacted third molar Surgery

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20181021041404N1
Enrollment
40
Registered
2018-11-14
Start date
2018-11-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Condition 1: Mandibular fully impacted third molar surgery. Condition 2: Postoperative facial swelling after mandibular fully impacted third molar surgery. Condition 3: Trismus after mandibular fully impacted third molar surgery. Condition 4: Dehiscence after mandibular fully impacted third molar surgery. Condition 5: Dry socket after mandibular fully impacted third molar surgery. Impacted teeth Localized swelling, mass and lump, unspecified Sprain of jaw Disruption of external operation (su

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group:first the thread will be twisted around the needle holder in clockwise direction A)Then, with the aid of the needle holder the middle of the loose thread is taken an

Sponsors

Research center of Semnan Dental School
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 30 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Both-sided and symmetrical impaction of mandibular third molar tooth that are classified in the same class by Pell & Gregory Meeting ASA1 systemic conditions Non-smokers patients Collaborative patients with frequent visits for follow up Patients without periodontal disease patients with proper oral hygiene patients aged between 20 and 30

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pathologic lesion in the impacted tooth Difference in follicle size around the crown of each person's sides Surgical time exceeding 25 minutes More than 5 minutes of surgical difference on both sides Taking steroids, drugs, alcohol, contraceptives Pregnancy and lactation History of delayed wound healing Failure to complete follow up sessions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain. Timepoint: Before starting surgery, it is assessed that there is no pain at the surgical site.pain of the patient 12 hours after surgery and on days 7, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 after surgery will be measured. Method of measurement: Visual Analogue Scale.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Swelling. Timepoint: Before starting surgery, 24 hours after surgery and the days 3rd and 7th after surgery. Method of measurement: Facial width will be measured by ticking three facial distances on a thread and then measuring it by a ruler. Horizontal: The distance between the corners of the lip to the attachment of the ear lobe on same side and the thread is subject to the cheeks. Vertical: The distance between the outer eye cantos and the mandibular angle of the same side and the thread is subject to the cheeks. Oblique: The distance from the corners of the lip and the mandibular angle of the same side and the thread is subject to the possible facial swelling (post-operative swelling).;Maximal oral opening rate. Timepoint: Before starting surgery, 24 hours after surgery and the days 3rd and 7th after surgery. Method of measurement: It will be calculated by measuring the distance between the central margin of the upper jaw and the central edge of the lower jaw (or left in the absence of the right central) by the digital caliper (Mitutoyo, Illinois, USA).;Dry socket. Timepoint: 24 hours after surgery and the days 3rd and 7th after surgery. Method of measurement: Blums criteria.;Dehiscence. Timepoint: 24 hours after surgery and the days 3rd and 7th after surgery. Method of measurement: The self-opening of sutures without patient’s intervention that define with observations.;Clinical attachment loss in 7th tooth distal. Timepoint: Before starting surgery, six months after surgery. Method of measurement: The distance between CEJ and the pocket bottom will be measured by william probe (Juya Instruments PVT, Tehran, Iran).;The 7th tooth distal pocket depth. Timepoint: Before starting surgery, six months after surgery. Method of measurement: The distance between the gingival margin and pocket bottom will be measured by the william probe (Juya Instruments PVT, Tehran, Iran).

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMohammad Esmaeelnejad

Semnan University of Medical Sciences

Esmaeelnejad@gmail.com+98 23 3333 4657

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026