Skip to content

Comparison of the effects of two types of vibrating and non-vibrating ankle orthoses on balance, proprioception, and reaction time of ankle muscles in people with chronic ankle instability

Comparison of the effect of vibratory and non-vibratory orthosis on sensorimotor function in people with chronic ankle instability

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20181021041400N2
Enrollment
57
Registered
2023-02-20
Start date
2023-05-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic ankle instability. Sprain and strain of ankle

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Ankle orthosis with Vibration. This type of orthosis consists of a supporting part and a vibrating part. Its supporting part is made of neoprene and thermoplastic a

Sponsors

Iran University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: History of at least 1 ankle sprain 1.1. The first sprain must have occurred at least 12 months prior to study participation. 1.2. The sprain is accompanied by inflammatory symptoms (pain, swelling, etc.). The last injury must have occurred more than 3 months before participating in the study. Feeling of emptying and ankle instability 2.1. At least 2 episodes of giving way in the 6 months prior to study participation. 2.2. A score of less than 24 on the Cumberland Instability Instrument Have not received treatment in the last 3 months. Age 60-18 years old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of previous surgeries on musculoskeletal structures (eg, bones, joint structures, nerves) in any lower limb History of fracture in any lower limb Acute injury to musculoskeletal structures of other joints of the lower limb in Past 3 months that has affected joint integrity and function resulting in at least 1 day away from daily activity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proprioception. Timepoint: Before the start of the study and 4 weeks after using the orthosis. Method of measurement: Biodex Multi-Joint Systems, Germany.;Reaction time of peroneus longus and brevis muscle during external perturbation. Timepoint: Before the start of the study and 4 weeks after using the orthosis. Method of measurement: Surface electromyography 8 canals Myon brand.;Postural control. Timepoint: Before the start of the study and 4 weeks after using the orthosis. Method of measurement: Force plate AMTI, Germany.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Quality of life. Timepoint: Before starting and 4 weeks after using the orthosis. Method of measurement: Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAMM) questionnaire.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMaryam Ashkar

Iran University of Medical Sciences

Ashkar.Maryam42@yahoo.com+98 21 2222 0947

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026