Comparison of the conventional open wedge osteotomy and open wedge osteotomy with sagital plane cutting methods in genovarum

Comparison of the results and prognosis of genovarum correction with open wedge osteotomy and open wedge osteotomy with sagital plane cutting methods in the treatment of patients with varus knee deformity

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20180904040954N1

Enrollment

Registered

2020-02-14

Start date

2020-02-19

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Genovarum deformity. Varus deformity, not elsewhere classified

Interventions

Intervention 1: Control group: Patients with genovarum underwent conventional surgery by open-wedge osteotomy (osteotomy cutting in a coronal plane and tibial tuberosity attached to the proximal tibia

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Peoples with knee genovarum Limb malalignment less than 20 degree Normal knee range of motion Absence of knee flexion contracture Normal knee ligaments

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Fracture in other limbs Open wound or infection Degenerative disease of knee joint Osteoarthritis of lateral and medial compartments Obese patients

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Knee assessment score. Timepoint: Evaluation of knee assessment score at beginning( before surgery) and 6 months later. Method of measurement: By knee society score questionnaire.;Union rate. Timepoint: Six months after surgery. Method of measurement: Clinical judgment and limb radiography.;Patella tilt. Timepoint: At beginning( before surgery) and 6 months later. Method of measurement: Insall salvati ratio; Blackburn peel ratio.	—

Measure

Time frame

Knee assessment score. Timepoint: Evaluation of knee assessment score at beginning( before surgery) and 6 months later. Method of measurement: By knee society score questionnaire.;Union rate. Timepoint: Six months after surgery. Method of measurement: Clinical judgment and limb radiography.;Patella tilt. Timepoint: At beginning( before surgery) and 6 months later. Method of measurement: Insall salvati ratio; Blackburn peel ratio.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Infection. Timepoint: Six weeks and six months later. Method of measurement: Clinical judgment and positive culture and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) test.;Intra-articular fracture. Timepoint: Intraoperative. Method of measurement: Intraoperative radiography.;Nerve injury. Timepoint: Immediately after surgery. Method of measurement: Clinical examination.;Tibiofemoral angle. Timepoint: Before surgery and six months after surgery. Method of measurement: Three joint radiography(hip;knee;ankle).;Medial proximal tibia angle. Timepoint: Before surgery; intraoperative and six months after surgery. Method of measurement: Three joint radiography(hip;knee;ankle).	—

Measure

Time frame

Infection. Timepoint: Six weeks and six months later. Method of measurement: Clinical judgment and positive culture and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) test.;Intra-articular fracture. Timepoint: Intraoperative. Method of measurement: Intraoperative radiography.;Nerve injury. Timepoint: Immediately after surgery. Method of measurement: Clinical examination.;Tibiofemoral angle. Timepoint: Before surgery and six months after surgery. Method of measurement: Three joint radiography(hip;knee;ankle).;Medial proximal tibia angle. Timepoint: Before surgery; intraoperative and six months after surgery. Method of measurement: Three joint radiography(hip;knee;ankle).

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMonireh Yaghoubi

Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences

monireh.yaghoubi@kums.ac.ir+98 83 3835 7752

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026