Educational intervention in the health volunteer in the intervention and control group with the aim of preparing healthy people and preventing and reducing injury in the event of natural disasters.
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention 1: "Intervention group:" Random selection of 45 health volunteers and conducting a pre-test after holding three training sessions before the natural disasters on Saturdays. Saturday class
Sponsors
Tarbiat Modares University
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
25 Years to 60 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Being motivated to be a health volunteer and agreeing to perform an educational intervention Have at least one year of work experience Health volunteers covered by health centers Having suitable physical condition in voluntary service work
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Absence of more than two sessions in intervention training programs No age limit for research intervention training programs. Physical inability to participate in the educational intervention program Lack of conditions for health services (Ministry of Health or Red Crescent or Welfare)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Behavioral skills assessment . Timepoint: Pre-test and then educational intervention and post-test and comparison of training methods immediately after training and 12 weeks and 24 weeks after intervention to evaluate the effect of time on behavioral skills. Method of measurement: With a questionnaire according to the Information, Motivation and Behavioral Skills (IMB) model, first perform a pre-test, then teach by lecturing through a training site, and after a group discussion, prepare for natural disasters, and then take a post-test and examine the skills and motivation variables in the intervention group. Immediately, 12 weeks and 24 weeks later, we will follow up to measure the effect of training on the skills of the trained people as an "intra-group test".;Measuring the self-efficacy of a health volunteer. Timepoint: Pre-test and then educational intervention and post-test and comparison of training methods immediately after training and 12 weeks and 24 weeks after intervention to evaluate the effect of time on people's ability, self-efficacy and self-management. Method of measurement: With a questionnaire according to the Information, Motivation and Behavioral Skills (IMB) model, first perform a pre-test, then train by lecturing through a training site and after operational maneuvers, assess the ability before natural disasters, and then take a post-test and examine the variables of self-efficacy and decision-making power. The control and intervention group will follow up immediately, 12 weeks and 24 weeks later, to measure the effect of training on individual self-efficacy as an "intergroup test".;Evaluate the information and knowledge of health volunteers. Timepoint: Pre-test and then educational intervention and post-test and comparison of training methods immediately after training and 12 weeks and 24 weeks after intervention to assess the effect of time on the level of knowledge of individuals. Method of measurement: With the questionnaire according to th | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Preparedness for natural disasters. Timepoint: Performing pre-test and educational intervention and post-test and measuring people's readiness immediately, 12 weeks later and 24 weeks after the intervention. Method of measurement: With the questionnaire and the construction of tools based on the results of the qualitative stage, the production of educational content for the preparation of people will be done, then the educational intervention will be done to improve the readiness of the people to the end. | — |
Countries
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Contacts
Public ContactFereshteh Amini
The University of Tarbiat Modares
Outcome results
None listed