The effectiveness of lidocaine and articaine in palatal anesthesia

A clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of buccal infiltration with 2% lidocaine versus 4% articaine in palatal anesthesia for maxillary teeth extraction

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20180710040413N1

Enrollment

300

Registered

2020-11-15

Start date

2020-11-21

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-11-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Maxillary teeth extraction. Disorder of teeth and supporting structures, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Intervention group I will receive 0.6 mL of 2 % lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100000. Intervention 2: Intervention group: Intervention group II will receive 0.6 ml o

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

16 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Aged range 16-60 years Requiring maxillary teeth extraction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Having drug intolerance Pregnant women Having uncontrolled systemic disease Mental retardation Having oral infections

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Palatal anesthesia. Timepoint: every 2 minutes over 1 hour after intervention. Method of measurement: Based on the questionnaire.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMahdi Gholami

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

gholamimh@mums.ac.ir+98 51 3883 2301

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026