Skip to content

Effect of cognitive behavioral group therapy in patients with chronic neuropathic pain

The effectiveness of group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) on pain coping strategies, perception, intensity and pain self-efficacy in patients with chronic neuropathic pain

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20180607040001N1
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-10-21
Start date
2017-01-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

chronic neuropathic pain.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Intervention group experienced cognitive behavioural group therapy (CBGT) and did pretest, posttest and follow up. Intervention 2: Control group: cortrol group didn

Sponsors

Islamic Azad University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
20 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participants who recognized chronic neuropathic pain by neurologist and don't have significant physical sickness. Whole participants are female. Age range of 20 to 60 years old. Inhabitant of Babol (from Babol). They haven't mental disorders. They have conscious satisfaction. They have education of high School and higher. They haven't participation in another instructional and therapeutic classes, simultaneously.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The participants who are absent for over two sessions. The participants who are unwilling to participate in this study. The participants who suffer from mental disorders. The participants who are physically illness.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain coping strategies, pain perception, pain intensity, pain self-efficacy. Timepoint: Two weeks before intervention. Method of measurement: Pain coping strategies were measured by pain coping strategies auestionnaire (CSQ) (Rosenstiel and keefe, 1983) , pain perception was measured by pain beliefs and perception inventory (PBPI) (Williams and Thorn, 1989) , pain intensity was measured by west Haven-Yale multidimensional pain inventory (Kerns et all, 1985) and pain self- efficacy was measured by pain self- efficacy questionnaire (Nicholas, 1989).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain coping strategies, pain perception, pain intensity, pain self-efficacy. Timepoint: Two weeks after intervention. Method of measurement: En Pain coping strategies were measured by pain coping strategies auestionnaire (CSQ) (Rosenstiel and keefe, 1983) , pain perception was measured by pain beliefs and perception inventory (PBPI) (Williams and Thorn, 1989) , pain intensity was measured by west Haven-Yale multidimensional pain inventory (Kerns et all, 1985) and pain self- efficacy was measured by pain self- efficacy questionnaire (Nicholas, 1989).

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMasoumeh Dehestani

Islamic Azad University

ddehestanim@gmail.com+98 11 3222 9146

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026