Skip to content

effect of Manual pressure release and Algometer pressure release on morphological characteristics in upper trapezius muscle with latent trigger points

Comparison of the effect of Manual pressure release and Algometer pressure release on morphological characteristics in latent upper trapezius muscle trigger points

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20180602039945N1
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-03-17
Start date
2018-06-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

latent trigger points. Soft tissue disorder, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention 1: First intervention group:manual pressure release.It is a popular, safe and effective treatment method that is carried out by a skilled physiotherapist.It is continuous manual pressure

Sponsors

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
20 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women with age ranges from 20 to 40 years presence of latent trigger points in the muscle based on the therapist's assessment presence of palpable taut bundles in skeletal muscle presence of at least 1 tender point in taut bundle in response to the pressure of 25 Newtons per square meter by the therapist Creation of pain at least 3 of 10 in visual scale of pain in Initial assessment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome History of severe head and neck injury and whiplash injury History of cervical spine surgery and fracture and hypermobility or instability Diagnosis of radiculopathy, myelopathy and malignancy Treating the trigger points in a past month If patients are not willing to continue to work for any reason

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain intensity based on the visual analogue scale. Timepoint: Before intervention; immediately after intervention; fifth session; 15 days after the last session. Method of measurement: Visual analogue pain.;Pressure pain threshold. Timepoint: Before intervention; immediately after intervention; fifth session; 15 days after the last session. Method of measurement: With algometer device.;Neck lateral flexion range of motion. Timepoint: Before intervention; immediately after intervention; fifth session; 15 days after the last session. Method of measurement: With goniometer device.;Thickness of upper trapezius muscle. Timepoint: Before intervention;fifth session; 15 days after the last session. Method of measurement: With the help of ultrasonography and measuring the vertical distance between two fascias.;Histogram of upper trapezius muscle. Timepoint: Before intervention;fifth session; 15 days after the last session. Method of measurement: With the help of ultrasonography and measure the mean light.;P angle in upper trapezius muscle fibers. Timepoint: Before intervention;fifth session; 15 days after the last session. Method of measurement: With the help of ultrasonography and measuring the angle of the fibers.;Quality of life. Timepoint: Before the intervention; fifth session. Method of measurement: Quality of life questionnaire with 36 items.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactRahimeh Fazeli

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

rahimehfazeli@yahoo.com+98 21 7631 6820

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026