Skip to content

"Comparing Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance with Motivational Interviewing on occupational performance in stroke patients"

Comparing the effect of “Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance” (CO-OP) with “Motivational Interviewing” (MI) on occupational performance in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20180515039676N1
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-12-11
Start date
2024-01-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

stroke. Stroke, not specified as hemorrhage or infarction

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Cognitive Orientation to Daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP). Intervention 2: Intervention group: Motivational Interviewing (MI). Intervention 3: Control group:

Sponsors

University of social welfare and rehabilitation sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Be a volunteer to enter the study (completion of the consent form) Chronic ischemic stroke (at least one year has passed since the stroke) diagnosed by a neurologist. Age 18 years and above Sufficient cognitive ability (minimum score of 22 on the Montreal Cognitive Test) Scores 5-18 in the Beck Depression Questionnaire (short form) (minimum level of depression or mild depression to moderate depression) Being in stage 3 and above Brunnstrom Absence of disorder in verbal understanding such as Wernicke's and Global aphasia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient's non-cooperation during the intervention or unwillingness to continue cooperation in the intervention2- Failure to follow up the patient to participate in at least two treatment sessions3- Reoccurrence of stroke

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Occupational performance. Timepoint: Before the intervention, five weeks and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Scale (COPM), Performance Quality Rating Scale (PQRS).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Self-efficacy. Timepoint: Before the intervention, five weeks and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE-10).;Independence in daily activities of life. Timepoint: Before the intervention, five weeks and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: Functional Independence Measurement (FIM).

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactShiva Abedi

University of social welfare and rehabilitation sciences

shiva.abedi.ot@gmail.com+98 31 3224 5327

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026