Comparison and evaluation of post-surgical outcome of mandibular third molar surgery by conventional rotary device and piezoelectric surgery.

Comparison and evaluation of pain, swelling and trismus of mandibular third molar surgery by conventional rotary device and piezoelectric surgery.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20180515039664N2

Enrollment

Registered

2020-05-11

Start date

2019-05-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impacted teeth. Impacted teeth

Interventions

Intervention 1: Control group: Injection of two lidocaine cartridges with the main anesthesia technique involves the use of an alveolar inferior nerve block (IANB) and Long buccally nerve block, then

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Existance of impacted third lower molar in degree of A or B and Class I or II of impaction (Pell & Gregory classification) Conscious consent to participate in the study No decay Absence of any systemic disease No pregnancy or lactation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Any factor that prevents the patient from continuing to study

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Pain. Timepoint: 1st, 3rd, 7th, and 14th day after surgery. Method of measurement: VAS pain scale.;Trismus. Timepoint: 1st, 3rd, 7th, and 14th day after surgery. Method of measurement: Clinical examination.;Trismus. Timepoint: 1st, 3rd, 7th, and 14th day after surgery. Method of measurement: Clinical examinaion.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMohammadali Fatehi MArj

Zahedan University of Medical Sciences

m.ali.f.m1993@gmail.com+98 54 3329 5715

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026