Skip to content

A comparison of sedative effect with dexmedetomidine -fentanyl versus midazolaml–fentanyl during cataract surgery with phacoemulsification technique

Comparison of the sedative effect with Dexmedetomidine-Midazolam and Fentanyl- Midazolam in patients who candidated for Phacoemulsification cataract surgery referred to Isfahan Feyz hospital from 2017-2018

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20180416039326N3
Enrollment
70
Registered
2018-10-15
Start date
2018-06-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract surgery. Cataract in diseases classified elsewhere

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group:patient in group (FD) received 1µg/kg Fentanyl with 0/5 µg/kg Dexmedetomidine in 20cc Normal salin for 10 minutes and then the continuous infusion of Dexmedetomidin

Sponsors

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 85 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients aged 18–85 years old ASA class 1 & 2 scheduled for phacoemulsification cataract surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: refusing, mentally challenged patients , history of chronic use of sedatives, narcotics or alcohol , allergy to any of the study medications , patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Asthma,, history of cardiac disease (cardiac block and bradycardia) bradycardia (heart rate less than 50 beats per minute), systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm, Severe hepatic failure, uncontrolled diabetes, left ventricular failure (EF less than 30), and cerebrovascular disease,severe renal failures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Sedation level. Timepoint: Every 5 minutes during surgery. Method of measurement: Ramsay sedation score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Medium atrial Blood pressure. Timepoint: Immediately before surgery, every 5 minutes during surgery and every 10 minutes for 30 minutes in recovery. Method of measurement: Pressure gauge.;Oxygen saturation percentage. Timepoint: Immediately before surgery, every 5 minutes during and after surgery every 10 minutes for 30 minutes in recovery. Method of measurement: Pulse oximetry.;Heart rate. Timepoint: Immediately before surgery, every 5 minutes during and after surgery every 10 minutes for 30 minutes in recovery. Method of measurement: Pulse oximetry.;Surgeon satisfaction. Timepoint: Immediately before surgery, every 5 minutes during and after surgery every 10 minutes for 30 minutes in recovery. Method of measurement: Likert questionnaire.;Patient satisfaction. Timepoint: Immediately before surgery, every 5 minutes during and after surgery every 10 minutes for 30 minutes in recovery. Method of measurement: Likert questionnaire.;Adverse drug reactions. Timepoint: Immediately before surgery, every 5 minutes during and after surgery every 10 minutes for 30 minutes in recovery. Method of measurement: Adverse drug reaction questionnaire.;Pain intensity. Timepoint: Immediately before surgery, every 5 minutes during and after surgery every 10 minutes for 30 minutes in recovery. Method of measurement: Universal Pain assessment tool.;Recovery time. Timepoint: After completing the intervention until the withdrawal from the recovery. Method of measurement: Minutes.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactHamidreza Shetabi

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences

Hamidshetabi@med.mui.ac.ir+98 31 3668 8138

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026