Evaluation of the Effect Biofeedback and Electrical Stimulation in Sexual Dysfunction

Comparison of the Effectiveness Biofeedback with Electrical Stimulation in Improving Patient with Sexual Dysfunction

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20180416039319N1

Enrollment

Registered

2018-05-09

Start date

2018-04-04

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stress incontinency, Sexual Dysfunction. Incomplete uterovaginal prolapse

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Biofeedback. Intervention 2: Intervention group: Electrical Stimulation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Stress incontinency and Sexual Dysfunction married

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: No Existence Systemic and Psychologic Illness No existence History of Pelvic Floor surgery No existence Pelvic Organ Prolapse grade3,4 Absence Psychoaffective drugs use

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Sexual Dysfunction Score in FSFI Questionarie. Timepoint: Sexual Dysfunction Score at initial of therapy and 1,,3 monthes after intervention. Method of measurement: FSFI Questionarie.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactBehnaz Aalaie

Artesh University of Medical Sciences

ethics@ajaums.ac.ir+98 21 8802 8350

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026