Examination of arthroscopic and fluoroscopic assisted methods in the treatment of intra-articular fracture of distal radius

Comparison of the functional and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic-assisted (AA) and fluoroscopic-assisted (FA) reduction of Intra-articular fracture of distal radius

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20180306038971N1

Enrollment

Registered

2020-05-22

Start date

2020-05-21

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-06-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intra-articular fracture of distal radius.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Based on the surgeon's decision, patients may have undergone open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with volar locking plate (VLP) and then additional arthrosc

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Intra-articular fracture of distal radius (AO/OTA type B3,C) Age over 18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Open fractures: type 2 and above according to the Gustilo-Anderson classification Concomitant fracture of the ipsilateral upper extremity or the other wrist except the ulnar styloid process fracture Neurovascular alteration such as acute carpal tunnel syndrome Compartment syndrome Previous limitation of movement in the wrist due to neuromuscular diseases or untreated nonunion or malunion of the wrist bones, or other injuries which interfered with the next rehabilitation program The need to use a dorsal plate to fix the fracture

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Comparison of the effect of surgical procedure on postoperative disability. Timepoint: 3rd and 12th months in postoperative follow-up. Method of measurement: Patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE) questionnaire.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Comparison of the effect of surgical procedure on extra-articular displacement, including radial inclination, radiocarpal tilt and ulnar variance. Timepoint: 12th months in postoperative follow-up. Method of measurement: Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LAT) wrist radiographs.;Comparison of the effect of surgical procedure on scapholunate (SL) and capitolunate (CL) angle. Timepoint: 12th months in postoperative follow-up. Method of measurement: LAT wrist radiography.;Comparison of the effect of surgical procedure on intra-articular displacement, including gap and step-off. Timepoint: 12th months in postoperative follow-up. Method of measurement: Wrist CT-scan.;Comparison of the effect of surgical procedure on postoperative pain. Timepoint: 3rd and 12th months in postoperative follow-up. Method of measurement: Visual analogue scale (VAS) questionnaire.;Comparison of the effect of surgical procedure on postoperative disability. Timepoint: 3rd and 12th months in postoperative follow-up. Method of measurement: Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire.;Comparison of the effect of surgical procedure on postoperative hand grip strength. Timepoint: 3rd and 12th months in postoperative follow-up. Method of measurement: Dynomometer.;Comparison of the effect of surgical procedure on postoperative wrist range of motion (ROM). Timepoint: 3rd and 12th months in postoperative follow-up. Method of measurement: Goniometer.	—

Measure

Time frame

Comparison of the effect of surgical procedure on extra-articular displacement, including radial inclination, radiocarpal tilt and ulnar variance. Timepoint: 12th months in postoperative follow-up. Method of measurement: Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LAT) wrist radiographs.;Comparison of the effect of surgical procedure on scapholunate (SL) and capitolunate (CL) angle. Timepoint: 12th months in postoperative follow-up. Method of measurement: LAT wrist radiography.;Comparison of the effect of surgical procedure on intra-articular displacement, including gap and step-off. Timepoint: 12th months in postoperative follow-up. Method of measurement: Wrist CT-scan.;Comparison of the effect of surgical procedure on postoperative pain. Timepoint: 3rd and 12th months in postoperative follow-up. Method of measurement: Visual analogue scale (VAS) questionnaire.;Comparison of the effect of surgical procedure on postoperative disability. Timepoint: 3rd and 12th months in postoperative follow-up. Method of measurement: Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire.;Comparison of the effect of surgical procedure on postoperative hand grip strength. Timepoint: 3rd and 12th months in postoperative follow-up. Method of measurement: Dynomometer.;Comparison of the effect of surgical procedure on postoperative wrist range of motion (ROM). Timepoint: 3rd and 12th months in postoperative follow-up. Method of measurement: Goniometer.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMohammad Ali Okhovat Pour

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

okhovatpour@sbmu.ac.ir+98 21 2303 1294

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026