Skip to content

The effect of childbirth positions on the severity of labor pain

Comparative study of the effect of using lithotomy, squatting and sitting positions in the second stage of physiologic delivery on severity of pain and outcome of childbirth in primiparous women

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20180128038535N3
Enrollment
96
Registered
2018-02-26
Start date
2010-11-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Study of the effect of three childbirth positions of squatting, sitting and lithotomy on the severity of labor pain.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Squatting position. Intervention 2: Intervention group: Sitting position. Intervention 3: Control group: Supine position(Lithotomy).

Sponsors

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 35 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Pregnant women aged between 18-35 years old Primiparous women Gestational age between 37 and 41 weeks Women in dilatation 8-9 cm (active phase of labor phase) Singleton pregnancy Fetal presentation (head) in the second stage of labor engagement and at least ischial spines is reached Estimated fetal weight is based on Johnson's law between 4,000-2500 grams The tendency and readiness for the physiological delivery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Anatomical and skeletal disorders All that leads to cesarean section Lack of labor progress in the first stage of labor by using paratograph form Rupture of the water bag over 12 hours Weakness and numbness in the legs (in squat position) Short Perinea (vaginal insertion distance to the anal inlet less than 3.5 cm) Maternal fatigue at the end of the first stage of labor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Severity of labor pain in the latent phase of the second stage of labor. Timepoint: After the intervention and the end of the latent phase of the second stage of labor. Method of measurement: Visual analogue Scale of McGill Pain.;Severity of labor pain in the active phase of the second stage of labor. Timepoint: After the intervention and the end of the active phase of the second stage of labor. Method of measurement: Visual analogue Scale of McGill Pain.;Severity of labor pain in the third stage of labor. Timepoint: After the intervention and the end of the third stage of labor. Method of measurement: Visual analogue Scale of McGill Pain.;Duration of the latent phase of the second stage of labor. Timepoint: After the intervention. Method of measurement: Kronometer.;Duration of the active phase of the second stage of labor. Timepoint: After the intervention. Method of measurement: Kronometer.;Duration of the third stage of labor. Timepoint: After the intervention. Method of measurement: Kronometer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Volume of bleeding in the first hour after delivery. Timepoint: After the intervention. Method of measurement: Scales, sanitary pad.;Type and degree of perineal tear. Timepoint: After the intervention and childbirth. Method of measurement: Observation and examination.;Apgar score of the infant in the first and fifth minutes of birth. Timepoint: After intervention and delivery. Method of measurement: Neonate Apgar Scale.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMehri Rezaie

Jahrom University of Medical Sciences

mehrangize_rezai@yahoo.com+98 71 5433 3002

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026