Comparing early failure in the conventional method and with the help of navigation in implant placement

Comparison of early failure of two conventional methods with the help of navigation (DIO NAVI) in implant placement NAVI) in implant placement

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20171224038042N1

Enrollment

Registered

2018-08-01

Start date

2018-01-21

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Implant placement.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: In a surgical group, 40 implants are performed in conventional way and the DIO brand (DIO Company, South Korea) is used and during the course of 6 months, the statu

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Must be free of any systemic, localized and malignant disease.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: People who need bone graft

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Success rate in each of the two methods of implant surgery. Timepoint: In a six-month period. Method of measurement: By Imaging and clinical examination and patient inquiries.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMohammad naeini

Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences

Naeini1347@yahoo.com+98 61 3333 5641

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026