FindTrial
Sign In

Comparative study of the optimal model (a combination of direct observation of practical skills and objectively structured clinical examination) with the traditional method of professional competence test at the end of the undergraduate course of midwifery students

Comparative study of the optimal model (a combination of direct observation of practical skills and objectively structured clinical examination) with the traditional method of professional competence test at the end of the undergraduate course of midwifery students

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20171224038025N2
Enrollment
65
Registered
2022-05-09
Start date
2021-06-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Professional competency test at the end of the midwifery course.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: The intervention is designed for students of Kerman University. This test is the professional competency test at the end of the midwifery course. The components of

Sponsors

Shahroud University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Passing the Courses of the midwifery course

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Known psychiatric illness Consumption of psychiatric drugs History of a recent traumatic event (incapable of taking the test)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Average score of students in the written exam. Timepoint: One week after the end of the test. Method of measurement: Written test score.;Average score of students in the osce test. Timepoint: One week after the end of the test. Method of measurement: By taking the average of students' scores from each station Standardized checklists.;Average score of students in dops test. Timepoint: One week after the end of the test. Method of measurement: With evaluation by two capable professors and with standardized checklists.;Satisfaction of students with the test. Timepoint: One week after the end of the test. Method of measurement: questionnaire.;Satisfaction of professors with the test. Timepoint: One week after the end of the test. Method of measurement: questionnaire.;Students' attitudes about the test method. Timepoint: One week after the end of the test. Method of measurement: Questionnaire with open questions.;Attitudes of professors about the test method. Timepoint: One week after the end of the test. Method of measurement: Questionnaire with open questions.;Student stress. Timepoint: Before and after the test. Method of measurement: questionnaire.;Anxiety. Timepoint: Before and after the test. Method of measurement: questionnaire.—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMahin Khajehpoor

Shahroud University of Medical Sciences

info@shmu.ac.ir+98 23 3239 5054

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026