Effectiveness of two Training Program on students with academic self defeating behaviors.

Comparison of Effectiveness of Training program based on Acceptance and Commitment Approach (ACT) and Cognitive-Behavioral Training (CBT) program On Improving Motivational Beliefs, Academic Emotions and Future Time Perspective in Students with Academic Self defeating Behaviors

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20171118037515N1

Enrollment

Registered

2018-01-16

Start date

2016-12-08

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Behavioral and Emotional disorders: Self-defeating behavior. Unspecified behavioral and emotional disorders with onset usually occurring in childhood and adolescence

Interventions

Intervention 1: The intervention group number 1 was student with self-defeating behavior who received Acceptance and Commitment Training.The students were trained for 8 sessions of 2 hours. Each sessi

Behavior

Control group:The control group had self-defeating students who did not receive any training.

The intervention group number 1 was student with self-defeating behavior who received Acceptance and Commitment Training.The students were trained for 8 sessions of 2 hours. Each session was followed

The intervention group number 2 was students with self defeating behavior who received the cognitive-behavioral training program.The students were trained for 8 sessions of 2 hours. Each session was f

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Having academic Self-defeating Behaviors Having a noticable problem on Motivational Beliefs Having negetive academic emotions Neglect to future time perspective

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Having severe psychological problems

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Motivational beliefs. Timepoint: Pretest, Post test, 3 month Follow up. Method of measurement: Motivational Strategies for Learning (MSLQ) for Measurement of Motivational Beliefs.;Academic Emotional. Timepoint: Pretest, Post test, 3 month Follow up. Method of measurement: Pekrun Academic Emotions (AEQ).;Time Perspective. Timepoint: Pretest, Post test, 3 month Follow up. Method of measurement: Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI).;Academic Self Defeating Behavior. Timepoint: Pretest, Post test, 3 month Follow up. Method of measurement: Cunningham Self-defeating Inventory (SDBS).	—

Measure

Time frame

Motivational beliefs. Timepoint: Pretest, Post test, 3 month Follow up. Method of measurement: Motivational Strategies for Learning (MSLQ) for Measurement of Motivational Beliefs.;Academic Emotional. Timepoint: Pretest, Post test, 3 month Follow up. Method of measurement: Pekrun Academic Emotions (AEQ).;Time Perspective. Timepoint: Pretest, Post test, 3 month Follow up. Method of measurement: Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI).;Academic Self Defeating Behavior. Timepoint: Pretest, Post test, 3 month Follow up. Method of measurement: Cunningham Self-defeating Inventory (SDBS).

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Psychological infexibility. Timepoint: Pretest, Post test , 3 month Follow up. Method of measurement: Acceptance And Commitment Questionnaire-2.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactSomayeh Hadadranjbar

Allameh Tabatabaie

s.hadad@vru.ac.ir+98 34 3422 1027

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026