Comparison of the clinical outcomes of conventional periodontal flap surgery versus laser-assisted periodontal flap surgery in patients with moderate to severe chronic periodontitis

Comparison of the clinical outcomes of conventional periodontal flap surgery versus laser-assisted periodontal flap surgery in patients with moderate to severe chronic periodontitis: a randomized clinical trial

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT201711129014N199

Enrollment

Registered

2017-11-20

Start date

2017-11-11

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic periodontitis. Chronic periodontitis

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Treatment of periodontitis of one side of the mouth via open flap and removing the granulation tissue by laser with a wavelength of 2780 nm. Intervention 2: Control

Treatment - Other

Treatment - Surgery

Intervention group: Treatment of periodontitis of one side of the mouth via open flap and removing the granulation tissue by laser with a wavelength of 2780 nm.

Control group: Treatment of periodontitis of the other side of the mouth via open flap and removing the granulation tissue by conventional surgery.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Age of 18 to 65 years; moderate to severe chronic periodontitis Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy or breastfeeding; chronic disease; using tobacco; a history of gum surgery; angular bone lesions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Average changes in pocket depth. Timepoint: 1 and 3 months after treatment. Method of measurement: With a clinical examination.;Average changes in changes in CAL. Timepoint: 1 and 3 months after treatment. Method of measurement: With a clinical examination.;Average changes in gum resorption. Timepoint: 1 and 3 months after treatment. Method of measurement: With a clinical examination.;Average changes in the percentage of plaque index. Timepoint: 1 and 3 months after treatment. Method of measurement: With a clinical examination.;Average changes in the percentage of gum bleeding. Timepoint: 1 and 3 months after treatment. Method of measurement: With a clinical examination.	—

Measure

Time frame

Average changes in pocket depth. Timepoint: 1 and 3 months after treatment. Method of measurement: With a clinical examination.;Average changes in changes in CAL. Timepoint: 1 and 3 months after treatment. Method of measurement: With a clinical examination.;Average changes in gum resorption. Timepoint: 1 and 3 months after treatment. Method of measurement: With a clinical examination.;Average changes in the percentage of plaque index. Timepoint: 1 and 3 months after treatment. Method of measurement: With a clinical examination.;Average changes in the percentage of gum bleeding. Timepoint: 1 and 3 months after treatment. Method of measurement: With a clinical examination.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr Iman Barati

School of Dentistry

baratibros@yahoo.com+98 81 3838 0572

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026