Skip to content

comparison of Tegatard and Tegretol on seizure control

Comparison of the efficacy of Tegatard and Tegretol on complex partial seizure and secondary generalized seizure

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2017092114217N1
Enrollment
240
Registered
2017-10-17
Start date
2017-10-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complex partial seizures developing into secondarily generalized seizures. Localization-related (focal)(partial) symptomatic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with complex partial seizures

Interventions

Intervention 1: 2. Control group: Tegretol 10-20 mg/kg/day in two divided dose. Intervention 2: 1. Intervention group: Tegatard 10-20 mg/kg/day in two divided dose.
Treatment - Drugs
2. Control group: Tegretol 10-20 mg/kg/day in two divided dose
1. Intervention group: Tegatard 10-20 mg/kg/day in two divided dose

Sponsors

Vice Chancellor for research, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor
Raha Pharmaceutical Company
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: patients with diagnosis of complex partial seizure or secondary generalized seizure according to international league against epilepsy; desire to participate in research; Signature of Moral Consent Form Exclusion criteria: Those patients in need of poly therapy; Patients who do not continue treatment for any reason; Seizures that are caused by systemic and metabolic diseases

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Seizure free duration. Timepoint: before intervention, after 3 and 6 month of intervention. Method of measurement: interview.;Frequency of seizure attack. Timepoint: before intervention, after 3 and 6 month of intervention. Method of measurement: interview.;Carbamazepine serum level. Timepoint: After 3 and 6 month of intervention. Method of measurement: Laboratory data.;Severity of seizure attack. Timepoint: After 3 and 6 month of intervention. Method of measurement: Severity of seizure questionnaire.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Neurological side effects. Timepoint: 3 and 6 month after treatment. Method of measurement: interview.;RBC count. Timepoint: 1 month after treatment. Method of measurement: Laboratory.;WBC count. Timepoint: 1 month after treatment. Method of measurement: Laboratory.;Platelet count. Timepoint: 1 month after treatment. Method of measurement: Laboratory.;Hgb serum level. Timepoint: 1 month after treatment. Method of measurement: Laboratory.;ALT serum level. Timepoint: 1 month after treatment. Method of measurement: Laboratory.;AST serum level. Timepoint: 1 month after treatment. Method of measurement: Laboratory.;ALKP serum level. Timepoint: 1 month after treatment. Method of measurement: Laboratory.;Direct bilirubin serum level. Timepoint: 1 month after treatment. Method of measurement: Laboratory.;Total bilirubin serum level. Timepoint: 1 month after treatment. Method of measurement: Laboratory.;Indirect bilirubin serum level. Timepoint: 1 month after treatment. Method of measurement: Laboratory.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr Mohammad Reza Najafi

Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

najafi@med.mui.ac.ir; mreznaj@gmail.com+98 31 3627 3910

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026