Skip to content

Comparison of three different psychotherapy method on Marriage Function and Psychological Well-Being

Comparison of The Effect of Olson’s Circumplex Model, Structural Family Therapy and Emotional Focused Therapy on Marriage Function and Psychological Well-Being of Unsatisfied Married Women

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2017072813776N5
Enrollment
120
Registered
2017-08-03
Start date
2017-01-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Condition 1: Psychological Well-Being. Condition 2: Marriage Function. Unspecified behavioural and emotional disorders with onset usually occurring in childhood and adolescence Counseling, Unspecified

Interventions

Intervention 1: Control group: There are not any intervention in control group. Intervention 2: Intervention group 1: 15 sessions( Olson’s Circumplex Model intervention). Intervention 3: Intervention
Behavior
Control group: There are not any intervention in control group
Intervention group 1: 15 sessions( Olson’s Circumplex Model intervention)
Intervention group 2: 15 sessions( Structural Family Therapy intervention)
Intervention group3: 15 sessions( Emotional Focused Therapy intervention)

Sponsors

NORTH KHORASAN ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY- BOJNOURD
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
24 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: they should be inhabitants in Gorgan and inclined to participate in the study; it should not be passed more than 18 years and less than 5 years from the begining of their joint life; the present family should not be faced with psychological disease, crime, addiction, incurable diseases, sexual disability, sterility and death of children; according to them, they should have mental and physical health and they should not have acute disease; the psychological well being and marriage function scores of persons should be one standard deviation less than mean score; the participants should have at least third grade of guidence school; they should not have the background of participating in similar psychoeducational interventions. Exclusion criteria: Lack of regular attendance at training sessions and Unwillingness to continue participating in the study; During the study, it will be determined that the conditions are not consistent with the research objectives.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Marriage Function. Timepoint: before intervention,after ,2 months follow up. Method of measurement: Marriage Functioning Assessment Inventory (MFAI).;Psychological Well-Being. Timepoint: before intervention,after ,2 months follow up. Method of measurement: Ryff’s psychological well-being scale.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Economics and Financial Issues. Timepoint: before intervention,after ,2 months follow up. Method of measurement: Marriage Functioning Assessment Inventory (MFAI).;Problem solving and decision making. Timepoint: before intervention,after ,2 months follow up. Method of measurement: Marriage Functioning Assessment Inventory (MFAI).;Emotional expression. Timepoint: before intervention,after ,2 months follow up. Method of measurement: Marriage Functioning Assessment Inventory (MFAI).;Couple relationship. Timepoint: before intervention,after ,2 months follow up. Method of measurement: Marriage Functioning Assessment Inventory (MFAI).;Role. Timepoint: before intervention,after ,2 months follow up. Method of measurement: Marriage Functioning Assessment Inventory (MFAI).;Flexibility. Timepoint: before intervention,after ,2 months follow up. Method of measurement: Marriage Functioning Assessment Inventory (MFAI).;Parenting Style. Timepoint: before intervention,after ,2 months follow up. Method of measurement: Marriage Functioning Assessment Inventory (MFAI).;Relatives and friends. Timepoint: before intervention,after ,2 months follow up. Method of measurement: Marriage Functioning Assessment Inventory (MFAI).;Values. Timepoint: before intervention,after ,2 months follow up. Method of measurement: Marriage Functioning Assessment Inventory (MFAI).;Physical and mental care. Timepoint: before intervention,after ,2 months follow up. Method of measurement: Marriage Functioning Assessment Inventory (MFAI).;Overall performance. Timepoint: before intervention,after ,2 months follow up. Method of measurement: Marriage Functioning Assessment Inventory (MFAI).;Self-acceptance. Timepoint: before intervention,after ,2 months follow up. Method of measurement: Ryff’s psychological well-being scale.;Purpose in life. Timepoint: before intervention,after ,2 months follow up. Method of measurement: Ryff’s psychological well-being scale.;Personal growth. Timepoint: before intervention,after ,2 mo

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactFateme Naghinasab Ardehaee

Islamic Azad University of Bojnourd

Fnaghinasab@gmail.com00

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026