Comparison of the accuracy of conventional and 3d printed orthognathic surgical splints in maxillary position

Comparison of the accuracy of orthognathic conventional and 3-D printed surgical splints in maxillary position

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20170723035253N2

Enrollment

Registered

2018-05-31

Start date

2016-03-20

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

3-d printed surgical splint.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Control group: conventional acrylic splint. Intervention 2: Intervention group: 3d printed splint.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

17 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 17-40 Yrs old. Patients with dentofacial disharmony, as a skeletal abnormality. Patients candidated for two jaw or maxillary single jaw orthognathic surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients candidated for maxillary segmental and mandibular single jaw surgery. Patients with systemic comorbidities interfering with surgical process and outcome. Cleft lip/palate or craniofacial syndrome patients

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Maxillary movements. Timepoint: preoperative and postoperative. Method of measurement: calipper: protractor.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Surgical splints. Timepoint: preoperative and postoperative. Method of measurement: visual.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactOmid Hamzezadeh Tofighi

Islamic Azad University

ohtofighi@gmail.com+98 21 2200 6660

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026