Skip to content

Comparison of Post-Operative Complications of impacted mandibular third molar surgery with Two Osteotomy Methods: Piezosurgery versus conventional rotary instruments

Comparison of Post-Operative Complications of impacted mandibular third molar surgery with Two Osteotomy Methods: Piezosurgery versus conventional rotary instruments

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2017050333792N1
Enrollment
20
Registered
2017-06-02
Start date
2016-04-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Impacted teeth. An impacted tooth is a tooth that has failed to erupt because of obstruction by another tooth

Interventions

Intervention 1: Surgery in Intervention 1group with the use of conventional rotary osteotomy instrument. Intervention 2: Surgery in Intervention group2 with the use of new Piezosurgery osteotomy instr
Treatment - Surgery
Surgery in Intervention 1group with the use of conventional rotary osteotomy instrument
Surgery in Intervention group2 with the use of new Piezosurgery osteotomy instrument

Sponsors

Vice Chancellor for Research, Ahwaz Jundishapour University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: patient intact in terms of systemic condition (ASA I); a bilateral mandibular impacted third molar with the surgery hardness degree of maximum 7 and the classification of winter at mesioangular or vertical position and in terms of latency level A or B and class ? or II in classification of Pell & Gregory; Surgery with hardness degree of 2 and 3 and the maximum difference of 1 between the two sides in terms of the degree of difficulty and same trauma from surgery in both sides of surgery; patient with the ability to fill in a questionnaire and consent Exclusion criteria: patients have a history of diabetes; patients with a history of heart disease and hypertension; patients with a history of hyperthyroidism; patients with a history of bleeding; patients with a history of liver disease and hepatitis; patients with a history of asthma and tuberculosis; patients pain and swelling and perocoronitis; the patient is pregnant or lactating women; patients with a history of corticosteroid with a history of drug use and cigarette smoking during the time of surgery more than 40 minutes; Lack of follow-up meetings

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Swelling. Timepoint: 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 7th day after surgery. Method of measurement: Nylon and Ruler.;Trismus. Timepoint: 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 7th day after surgery. Method of measurement: coulisse.;Pain. Timepoint: 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 7th day after surgery. Method of measurement: VAS pain scale.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public Contact?Dr Hamidreza Falahi

Ahwaz Dental School

dr.hamidrezafallahi@yahoo.com+98 61 3338 6675

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026