Skip to content

To Evaluate the Effectiveness of Whole Body Vibration on Strength and Endurance of Core muscles in Ambulant Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

To Evaluate the Effectiveness of Whole Body Vibration on Strength and Endurance of Core muscles in Ambulant Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2017041328447N6
Enrollment
50
Registered
2017-06-19
Start date
2017-06-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis. Multiple sclerosis

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Patients are treated for 6 weeks, 3 sessions per week, 5 sets per session by Whole Body Vibration apparatus.The vibration exercise to rest ratio is 30:60 for the f
Rehabilitation
Intervention group: Patients are treated for 6 weeks, 3 sessions per week, 5 sets per session by Whole Body Vibration apparatus.The vibration exercise to rest ratio is 30:60 for the first two weeks(V
Control group: This group does not receive any treatment and continue their normal life

Sponsors

Shiraz University of Medical Science
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: People with mild to moderate disability (EDSS=1-5.5)the ability to ambulate 10 meters with or without assisstive device; Confirmed diagnosis of MS by physician; Lack of mental problems , Fracture and have an implant in the body; No history of attacks and relapses during the past 2 months; Having no experience of vibration during the last 3 months; Age range of 20-50 years Exclusion criteria: Implant in the body; Epilepsy; Tumors; Corticosteroid injection 28 days before the intervention; Osteoporosis; Discopathy; Diabetes; Severe wounds and scarring; Attacks during the application of WBV

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Isometric Strength of Flexor Muscles of Trunk. Timepoint: Before and After Intervention. Method of measurement: Measuring Isometric Strength with Dynamometer a specified period.;Isometric Strength of Extensor Muscles of Trunk. Timepoint: Before and After Intervention. Method of measurement: Measuring Isometric Strength with Dynamometer a specified period.;IsometricSstrength of Lat Flexor Muscles of Trunk. Timepoint: Before and After Intervention. Method of measurement: Measuring Isometric Strength with Dynamometer a specified period.;Endurance of Flexor Muscles of Trunk. Timepoint: Before and After Intervention. Method of measurement: Measuring Isometric Strength with Dynamometer a specified period.;Endurance of Extensor Muscles of Trunk. Timepoint: Before and After Intervention. Method of measurement: Measuring Isometric Strength with Dynamometer a specified period.;Endurance of Lat Flexor Muscles of Trunk. Timepoint: Before and After Intervention. Method of measurement: Measuring Isometric Strength with Dynamometer a specified period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Quality of Life. Timepoint: One Month After Intervention. Method of measurement: Questionnaire.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMaryam Abbasi

Shiraz School of Rehabilitation Science

abbasi_pt90@yahoo.com; yoosefinejad@sums.ac.ir+98 71 3626 5108

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026