Shoulder joint dislocation surgeries: a comparison between two techniques

Clinical evaluation on acromioclavicular joint dislocations; A) Ethibond suture peri-clavicular loop vs B) Ethibond suture through two holes in clavicle

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT201704087274N12

Enrollment

Registered

2017-04-12

Start date

2017-01-20

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dislocation of acromioclavicular joint. Dislocation of acromioclavicular joint

Interventions

Intervention 1: Group A (AC joint repair using two holes): In this group the Ethibond-5 suture will be folded and will be pass underneath the coracoid process and it will be pass through two holes whi

Treatment - Surgery

Group A (AC joint repair using two holes): In this group the Ethibond-5 suture will be folded and will be pass underneath the coracoid process and it will be pass through two holes which will be crea

In the second group, instead of passing the suture anchor through holes, it will be looped around the clavicle and coracoid. After reducing the acromioclavicular joint, the anchore suture will be knot

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: patients with: age>18 years, clinically and radiographically diagnosed as acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation (in the first 3 weeks) with grade III-VI . Exclusion criteria: age>65 years, chroninc dislocation, history of previous shoulder trauma, concomitant lesion in the suffered arm.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Horizontal status of radiography of the acromioclavicular joint. Timepoint: pre-operation visit, three, six and twelve monthes foloow ups. Method of measurement: using a ruler with milimeter.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Functional shouldet status. Timepoint: Pre-operation, third, sixth, and twelve monthes follow ups. Method of measurement: Taft score.;Functional shouldet status. Timepoint: Pre-operation, third, sixth, and twelve monthes follow ups. Method of measurement: Constant score.;Functional shouldet status. Timepoint: Pre-operation, third, sixth, and twelve monthes follow ups. Method of measurement: Acromioclavicular joint instability score.	—

Measure

Time frame

Functional shouldet status. Timepoint: Pre-operation, third, sixth, and twelve monthes follow ups. Method of measurement: Taft score.;Functional shouldet status. Timepoint: Pre-operation, third, sixth, and twelve monthes follow ups. Method of measurement: Constant score.;Functional shouldet status. Timepoint: Pre-operation, third, sixth, and twelve monthes follow ups. Method of measurement: Acromioclavicular joint instability score.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMohsen Mardani Kivi MD.

Guilan University of Medical Science

dr_mohsen_mardani@yahoo.com+98 13 3334 4897

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026