Skip to content

The Effect of Clinical Education and Evaluation with Potfolio Method and Routin Method on the Perceptions of Nursing Students

Comparison of The Effects of Clinical Education and Evaluation with Potfolio Method and Routin Method on the Perceptions of Nursing Students in Educational Field of Coronary Care Unit of Towhid Hospital of Sanandaj in 2016-17.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2017022232718N1
Enrollment
40
Registered
2017-04-24
Start date
2017-09-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

nursing students education. other problem related to education and literacy

Interventions

Intervention 1: . Portfolio method will explain to intervention group in the first day of training. Portfolio folder include clinical detail purposes paper, educational requierments paper and weekly
. In control group ,in long range 4 weeks training, (3 days per week) clinical detail purposes will deliver and routin method based on coronary care ward routin will Carried out. In the end of field
. Portfolio method will explain to intervention group in the first day of training. Portfolio folder include clinical detail purposes paper, educational requierments paper and weekly report papers. I

Sponsors

Kurdistan university of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: . Inclusion criteria: whole of 7th semester nursing students that have passed coronary care nursing Theory. Exclusion criteria :absence more than one day ; undeliver first week report

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Student perceptions. Timepoint: 12th day. Method of measurement: DREEM standard questionair.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Terminal training score. Timepoint: the end of training. Method of measurement: less than 12(very weak) , 12-13.99 (weak) , 14-15.99 (intermediate) , 16-17.99 (good) , 18 and higher (exellent).

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMohammad Zahed Rokhzadi

Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences

zrokhzadi@yahoo.com zahed.rokhzadi@muk.ac.ir+98 87 3362 3004

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026