Skip to content

Compare the efficacy of nanocrystalline silver dressings compared with ?conventional dressings in patients with impaired upper limb crushed fingers

Compare the efficacy of nanocrystalline silver dressings compared with ?conventional dressings in patients with impaired upper limb crushed fingers

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2017021520258N33
Enrollment
70
Registered
2017-03-06
Start date
2016-06-14
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crush injury. Crushing injury of forearm

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: applying nano crystalline silver in intervention group. Intervention 2: Control group: applying normal wound dressing in control group.?.
Treatment - Drugs
Intervention group: applying nano crystalline silver in intervention group.
Control group: applying normal wound dressing in control group.?

Sponsors

Vice chancellor for research, Arak University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: age 18 to 70 years with Finger injury with damage to the muscle of the ?upper limb; crush injury in ?10 to20 centimeter in muscles. Exclusion criteria: involvement of tendons, blood vessels, muscles, nerves and bones at the site of damage; systemic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders, collagen vascular, immuno suppression (diabetes, transplant) malignant;   inflammatory and infectious diseases at the same time; malnutrition (important in wound healing); addiction; pregnancy; breastfeeding; need for limb amputation;Loss of consciousness and traumatic brain injury; need for further surgery on the wound; history of skin allergy to silver; infected wounds before applying the dressing first stage

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Improving wound. Timepoint: End of first, second, third and fourth (4 times) after surgery. Method of measurement: Clinical.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr Morteza Gharibi

Arak University of Medical Sciences

gharibi@arakmu.ac.ir+98 86 3222 2003

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026