Skip to content

Comparing the effect of Ortodentol and chlorhexidine mouthwashes 10% and /12 percent on oral hygiene intubated patients in intensive care units

Comparing the effect of Ortodentol and chlorhexidine mouthwashes 10% and /12 percent on oral hygiene intubated patients in intensive care units

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2017012232101N1
Enrollment
90
Registered
2017-04-02
Start date
2016-07-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Condition 1: Chronic Obstruactive Pulmanary Disease. Condition 2: Diabeteic Mellitus. Condition 3: Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Condition 4: Multiple Truma. Condition 5: Cerebral Vascular Attacke. Condition 6: Gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Condition 7: Poisoning. Condition 8: laparatomy. Condition 9: Intracerebral haemorrhage. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified Diabetes mellitus Adult respiratory distress syndrome Injuries involving multiple body regions Stroke, not specif

Interventions

Intervention 1: The intervention group (mouthwash ortodentoll) ortodentol mouthwash solution containing 10% carvacrol extracts pharmaceutical company Khorramabad, Lorestan building twice a day (mornin
Prevention
The intervention group (mouthwash ortodentoll) ortodentol mouthwash solution containing 10% carvacrol extracts pharmaceutical company Khorramabad, Lorestan building twice a day (morning and evening) e
The control group (chlorhexidine)Control (chlorhexidine) solution of chlorhexidine / 12% Manufacturing Co. World Health Tehran twice a day (morning and evening) patients intubated mouth rinse with a s

Sponsors

Vice , President , Research and Technology , University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
15 Years to 85 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria included: the patient has an endotracheal tube through the mouth ;with the age of 15-85 years ; 8 hours of intubation in the intensive care unit, before ; no history of allergy is to plant compounds Savory (carvacrol) ; Lack of any damage characterized by endotracheal intubation or planes in the mouth Lesion is unknown. Exclusion criteria included: transmission or discharge or death of the patient from the intensive care unit before the study was completed ; Creating profit any damage characterized by endotracheal intubation or planes or other physical Hram ; Lack of desire to continue to study the patient's legal guardian ; and immune system dysfunction, radiotherapy and chemotherapy and having any malignant disease.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Oral Health. Timepoint: Before and after the intervention. Method of measurement: Beck standard questionnaire and measured plaque and oral mucosal.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Malnutrition. Timepoint: Scale. Method of measurement: Relative.;Side Efect. Timepoint: Scale. Method of measurement: Relative.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMirzakhani Hojat

Shahrekord , Medical , University

mirzakhani.h2014@yahoo.com00893834226410

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026