Comparison of the effect of articaine infiltrated anesthesia with lidocaine block anesthesia in the treatment of mandibular second molar palpotomy

Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of Articaine infiltration versus lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block in pulp therapy of lower second primary molars

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20170101031697N5

Enrollment

Registered

2021-01-07

Start date

2020-12-26

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Local anesthesia. Local anaesthetics

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: the first session of lidocaine infraalveolar nerve block injection and the second session of articaine infiltration injection. In this group, in order to pulpotomy

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

4 Years to 10 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy children four to ten years old who need treatment for the pulp molars of the mandible on both sides.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Children who have any sores or mucosal lesions during treatment sessions in the buccal vestibule.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Pain when exposing the pulp. Timepoint: When exposing the pulp. Method of measurement: Using the Visual Analogue Scale chart.;Pain during injection start. Timepoint: During injection start. Method of measurement: Using the Visual Analogue Scale chart.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactSara Esmaeili

Bandare-abbas University of Medical Sciences

saraesmaili43@gmail.com+98 76 3334 5009

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026