Skip to content

A comparison of the effect of floor mat and shoe insole on low back pain due to prolonged standing

A comparison of the effect of anti-fatigue floor mat and viscoelastic shoe insole on preventing of low back pain due to prolonged standing in healthy subjects: An interventional study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2016122430546N2
Enrollment
15
Registered
2017-01-20
Start date
2012-10-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low back pain. Low back pain

Interventions

Intervention 1: The use of anti-fatigue floor mat while standing. Participants were instructed to stand in their usual manner, do not take any step, and do not lean on the table to rest their feet and
Prevention
Placebo
The use of anti-fatigue floor mat while standing. Participants were instructed to stand in their usual manner, do not take any step, and do not lean on the table to rest their feet and to support the
The use of viscoelastic shoe insole while standing on a hard floor. Participants were instructed to stand in their usual manner, do not take any step, and do not lean on the table to rest their feet
The use of viscoelastic shoe insole while standing on the anti-fatigue floor mat. Participants were instructed to stand in their usual manner, do not take any step, and do not lean on the table to re
Using a placebo shoe insole while standing on a hard floor. Participants were instructed to stand in their usual manner, do not take any step, and do not lean on the table to rest their feet and to s

Sponsors

Vice chancellor for research of Urmia University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male
Age
20 Years to 30 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Consent to participate in the study; the lack of any history of low back pain (LBP) requiring medical intervention or more than 3 days sick absence; any history of LBP over the past 12 months; no previous hip surgery; ability to stand for more than 4 hours; not having any kind of occupation requiring static standing over the past 12 months. Exclusion criteria: The lack of consent to participate in the study; having any history of LBP requiring medical intervention or more than 3 days sick absence; having any history of LBP over the past 12 months; having previous hip surgery; the lack of ability to stand for more than 4 hours; having any kind of occupation requiring static standing over the past 12 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Gluteus medius muscles co activation. Timepoint: Every 15 minutes during 2 hours standing. Method of measurement: Electromyography.;Subjective pain. Timepoint: Every 15 minutes during 2 hours standing. Method of measurement: Visual analogus scales.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMahmoud Ghaderi

Urmia University of Medical Sciences

ghaderi_mahmoud@yahoo.com+98 44 3193 7224

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026