Skip to content

Comparison of the adverse effect of two methods of nephrolithotomy in patients having kidney stone

Comparison of the adverse effect of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus & tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients having kidney stone: a single blinded randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT201611019014N129
Enrollment
58
Registered
2016-11-18
Start date
2015-04-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

kidney stone. Calculus of kidney

Interventions

Treatment - Surgery
Treatment - Drugs
Intervention group: Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Intervention 1: Intervention group: Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Intervention 2: Control group: Standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Control group: Standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Sponsors

Vice-chancellor for Research the Technology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Kidney stone; age of 18 to 80 years. Exclusion criteria: Indication of open surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Hemoglobin. Timepoint: before and 24 hours after intervention. Method of measurement: through laboratory testing.;Hematoma. Timepoint: 24 hours after intervention. Method of measurement: using sonography.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain. Timepoint: 24 hours after surgery. Method of measurement: using VAS.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr Mahmood Ebrahimi

Shahid Beheshti Hospital

drmebrahimi22@yahoo.com+98 81 3838 0283

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026