comparing the pain during extraction of maxillary primary molars after injection with articaine and lidocaine

Comparing the efficacy of infiltration with 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for extraction of maxillary primary molars

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20161029030552N2

Enrollment

Registered

2018-12-24

Start date

2018-10-23

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

local anesthesia. Local anaesthetics

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: infiltration with a carpule 2% lidocaine and 1.80000 epinephrine. Intervention 2: Intervention group: infiltration with a carpule containing 4% articaine and 1.1000

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

6 Years to 9 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: at least 2 maxillary primary molars with same characteristics needing extraction cooperative behavior for dental treatment under local anesthesia physical and psychological health of the child

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: history of allergy to local anesthetic solution abscess in the injection site consumption of analgesics in the last 24 hours

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Pain. Timepoint: during tooth extraction. Method of measurement: visual analogue scale.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactYasamin Khaksar

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

khaksar_y@sums.ac.ir+98 71 3626 3193

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026