Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of two techniques in pulp therapy of lower primary molars

Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine infiltration versus lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block in pulp therapy of lower primary molars

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT2016102830448N2

Enrollment

Registered

2016-11-14

Start date

2016-11-21

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Local anaesthesia. Local anaesthetics

Interventions

Intervention 1: Articaine , infiltration, 4% , injection. Intervention 2: lidocaine , infraalveolar nerve block injection , 2 % , injection.

Treatment - Drugs

Articaine , infiltration, 4% , injection

lidocaine , infraalveolar nerve block injection , 2 % , injection

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

4 Years to 10 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion: 4-10 years old children who are healthy and have good coopration and need bilateral lower primary molar pulp therapy or deep restorations. Exclusion: Children who do not cooperate or have a history of medical problems for local anesthesia or have a wound or mucousal lesions in the buccal vestibule

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Pain. Timepoint: one week. Method of measurement: visual analuge scale.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr Maryam Sharifi

Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences

maryam_sharifi_79@yahoo.com+98 34 3428 0031

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026