Skip to content

Comparing cardiovascular effects of conventional versus video intubation

Comparing hemodynamic effects of conventional laryngoscope versus Video Laryngoscope in surgeries of Imam Reza hospital of Birjand in 2015

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2016102718063N4
Enrollment
42
Registered
2016-11-07
Start date
2016-06-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation Complications. Failed or difficult intubation

Interventions

Intervention 1: Conventional laryngoscopy group: patients of this group will be intubated using a conventional laryngoscope. Intervention 2: Video laryngoscopy group: patients of this group will be i
Treatment - Other
Treatment - Drugs
Conventional laryngoscopy group: patients of this group will be intubated using a conventional laryngoscope.
Video laryngoscopy group: patients of this group will be intubated using the video laryngoscope.

Sponsors

Vice-chancellor for research - Birjand University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: age between 18 and 50 years old; would like to participate in the study after a full explanation of the research objectives and methods advantages and disadvantages; according to America Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) patients should be in class one and two (ASA Class I and II). Exclusion criteria: emergency patients; patients who are diagnosed unstable in hemodynamic parameters; patients with a variety of systemic diseases (HTN, DM, COPD, asthma, etc.); patients with a history of drug abuse; patients with high Malanpaty 2; patients with a BMI greater than 35; patients suffering from neck movements; difficult intubation criteria; patients who have difficulty in opening mouth.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure. Timepoint: Before anesthesia-After Intubation. Method of measurement: Blood Pressure Monitoring.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Heart Rate. Timepoint: Before Anesthesia-After Intubation. Method of measurement: Vital Sign Monitoring.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMahmoud Jafari

Birjand University of Medical Sciences

drmjafari5220281@gmail.com+98 56 3244 3000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026