Using of piezosurgery technique in rhinoplasty for nasal hump reduction

Evaluation of success rate of piezosurgery technique in nasal hump reduction and comparison with conventional method: A randomized double blind clinical trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT201610219926N3

Enrollment

Registered

2017-01-06

Start date

2017-01-07

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasal deformity. Q10-Q18 Congenital malformations of eye, ear, face and neck

Interventions

Intervention 1: Hump reduction is done with piezosurgery technique. Intervention 2: Hump reduction is conducted with osteotome and rasp.

Treatment - Surgery

Hump reduction is done with piezosurgery technique.

Hump reduction is conducted with osteotome and rasp.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The inclusion criteria are presence of dorsal hump in a patient, who is candidate for primary rhinoplasty; ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class I patients. The exclusion criteria are history of bleeding in patient or his or her family; consumption of drugs which intervene with coagulation system; consumption of oral contraceptive drugs; secondary nasal deformity.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Symmetry of nasal dorsum. Timepoint: Ten days, 4 weeks, 3 monthes after intervention. Method of measurement: Questionnaire.;Compatibility rate of the amount of acquired hump reduction after surgery with the predetermined amount (during presurgical phase). Timepoint: Three monthes after iontervention. Method of measurement: Questionnaire.;Rate of patient’s satisfaction about final appearance of nasal dorsum. Timepoint: Three monthes after intervention. Method of measurement: Questionnaire.	—

Measure

Time frame

Symmetry of nasal dorsum. Timepoint: Ten days, 4 weeks, 3 monthes after intervention. Method of measurement: Questionnaire.;Compatibility rate of the amount of acquired hump reduction after surgery with the predetermined amount (during presurgical phase). Timepoint: Three monthes after iontervention. Method of measurement: Questionnaire.;Rate of patient’s satisfaction about final appearance of nasal dorsum. Timepoint: Three monthes after intervention. Method of measurement: Questionnaire.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Bony irregularities of nasal dorsum. Timepoint: Ten days, 4 weeks, 3 monthes after intervention. Method of measurement: Questionnaire.;Bony prominence of nasal dorsum. Timepoint: Ten days, 4 weeks, 3 monthes after intervention. Method of measurement: Questionnaire.;Cutaneous complications in nasal dorsum. Timepoint: Ten days, 4 weeks, 3 monthes after intervention. Method of measurement: Questionnaire.	—

Measure

Time frame

Bony irregularities of nasal dorsum. Timepoint: Ten days, 4 weeks, 3 monthes after intervention. Method of measurement: Questionnaire.;Bony prominence of nasal dorsum. Timepoint: Ten days, 4 weeks, 3 monthes after intervention. Method of measurement: Questionnaire.;Cutaneous complications in nasal dorsum. Timepoint: Ten days, 4 weeks, 3 monthes after intervention. Method of measurement: Questionnaire.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMohammad Reza Jamalpour

Hamadan University of Medical Sciences

jamalpour@umsha.ac.ir+98 81 3838 1059

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026