Effect of lead protection layer versus standard protection on the amount of radiation received by the patient and surgeon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Effect of lead protection layer versus standard protection on the amount of radiation received by the patient and surgeon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a before-after clinical trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT201610099014N122

Enrollment

Registered

2016-10-19

Start date

2016-11-21

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nephrolithiasis. Calculus of kidney

Interventions

Intervention 1: Routine lead protective glasses and lead cover for the trunk, lower limbs and neck in addition to covering patient's bed by a lead protective layer with a thickness of 2 mm and length

Prevention

Routine lead protective glasses and lead cover for the trunk, lower limbs and neck in addition to covering patient's bed by a lead protective layer with a thickness of 2 mm and length of 180 cm and a

Just routine lead protective glasses and lead cover for the trunk, lower limbs and neck

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Candidate for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Exclusion criteria: Nothing.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Assessing the amount of absorbed radiation dose two months. Timepoint: after the beginning of study. Method of measurement: using TLD chip.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Nothing. Timepoint: Nothing. Method of measurement: Nothing.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactRozgar Dansh Doost

Besat Hospital

saro.dan66@gmail.com+98 81 3364 0030

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026