Comparison of the results of treatment of clavicle fractures with bandage and thoracolumbar brace

Comparision of callus formation in treatment of patients with clavicle fractures using bandage 8 versus thoracolumbar back support

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT201608226160N2

Enrollment

Registered

2016-10-21

Start date

2016-09-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clavicle fracture. Fracture of clavicle

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Thoracolumbar or ghoozbande poshti (Farsi) which is used for prevention and treatment of kyphosis ( Teb & Sanat, Tehran, Iran).It will be used for 4 weeks in this s

Treatment - Other

Intervention group: Thoracolumbar or ghoozbande poshti (Farsi) which is used for prevention and treatment of kyphosis ( Teb & Sanat, Tehran, Iran).It will be used for 4 weeks in this study.

Control group: Bandage 8 consisting of routine or multiple layers of bandage with the figure of 8 used for the fixation and applying traction in clavicle fracture (Teb & Sanat, Tehran, Iran). It will

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Age between 18 to 60; clavicle fracture Exclusion criteria: Open fracture of clavicle; fracture of clavicle and scapula; clavicle fracture with progressive neurovascular injury; bilateral clavicle fracture; multiple rib fracture; patients with fracture of clavicle with more than 3 segments or shortening of clavicle more than 2cm in length; fractures of the distal one third of the same side clavicle

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Callus formation. Timepoint: 1 week, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks following the intervention. Method of measurement: simple radiograph.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Decreased range of motion. Timepoint: 1 week, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks following the intervention. Method of measurement: clinical examination.;Nonunion. Timepoint: 1 week, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks following the intervention. Method of measurement: simple radiograph.;Pain at the site of the fracture. Timepoint: 1 week, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks following the intervention. Method of measurement: Visual Pain Scale.;Malunion. Timepoint: 1 week, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks following the intervention. Method of measurement: simple radiograph.;Neurovascular complications. Timepoint: 1 week, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks following the intervention. Method of measurement: clinical examination.;Deformity. Timepoint: 1 week, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks following the intervention. Method of measurement: simple radiograph.	—

Measure

Time frame

Decreased range of motion. Timepoint: 1 week, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks following the intervention. Method of measurement: clinical examination.;Nonunion. Timepoint: 1 week, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks following the intervention. Method of measurement: simple radiograph.;Pain at the site of the fracture. Timepoint: 1 week, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks following the intervention. Method of measurement: Visual Pain Scale.;Malunion. Timepoint: 1 week, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks following the intervention. Method of measurement: simple radiograph.;Neurovascular complications. Timepoint: 1 week, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks following the intervention. Method of measurement: clinical examination.;Deformity. Timepoint: 1 week, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks following the intervention. Method of measurement: simple radiograph.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactPeyman Moharramzadeh

Tabriz Univercity of Medical Science

paymanem@yahoo.com+98 41 3334 3640

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026