Skip to content

Efficacy and saftey of fractional Er:YAG versus microneedling in treatment of facial rhytides

Efficacy and saftey of fractional Er:YAG versus microneedling in treatment of facial rhytides in 45-75 years old patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20160820029436N3
Enrollment
36
Registered
2018-02-04
Start date
2018-01-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Facial skin wrinkles.

Interventions

Intervention 1: In 45 to 75 years old patients with mild to moderate facial skin wrinkles, a half-face is subjected to a microneedling monthly up to three time and Its efficacy and safety are examined

Sponsors

Deputy of Research, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
45 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age 45 to 75 Mild to moderate wrinkling on the face

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant or breast feed History of cuagulopathy disorder or drug Facial active Infection Inability to fallow up visit connective tissue disorder History of skin cancer on face Unrealistic expectation Cosmetic procedures performed on the face in the last 6 month Fitzpatrick skin phototype >III Sensitivity to lidocain Use isotretinoin in the last 6 month History of keloid Use photosensitive drug such gold, tetracyclin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Transepidermal water loss. Timepoint: Before each treatment session and then after three month of treatment. Method of measurement: Measurement of skin biophysical properties by MPA-9 device.;Skin hydration. Timepoint: Before each treatment session and then after three month of treatment. Method of measurement: By dermatologist and using MPA-9 device.;Patient satisfaction. Timepoint: Before each treatment session monthly and then after three month of treatment. Method of measurement: Asking the patient.;Downtime. Timepoint: Before tretment every month and then after three month of treatment. Method of measurement: By dermatologist.;Clinical assessment of improvement. Timepoint: Before treatment every month and then after three month of treatment. Method of measurement: By dermatologist by comparing the patient's pictures.;Skin resonance time. Timepoint: Before treatment every month and then after three month of treatment. Method of measurement: By dermatologist and using reviscometer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain. Timepoint: Before esch treatment session monthly. Method of measurement: Asking the patient.;Burning. Timepoint: Before esch treatment session. Method of measurement: Asking the patient.;Erythema. Timepoint: Before esch treatment session. Method of measurement: Asking the patient.;Edema. Timepoint: Before esch treatment session. Method of measurement: Asking the patient.;Bulla formation. Timepoint: Before esch treatment session. Method of measurement: Asking the patient.;Bleeding. Timepoint: Before esch treatment session. Method of measurement: Asking the patient.;Dispigmentation. Timepoint: Before esch treatment session. Method of measurement: Asking the patient and by dermatologist.;Scar formation. Timepoint: Before esch treatment session. Method of measurement: Asking the patient and by dermatologist.;Skin atrophia. Timepoint: Before esch treatment session. Method of measurement: Asking the patient and by dermatologist.;Crust formation. Timepoint: Before esch treatment session. Method of measurement: Asking the patient and by dermatologist.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactBehnaz Hamedani

Skin Research Center of Shahid Beheshti University

hamedanibehnaz@gmail.com+98 24 3552 5289

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026