Skip to content

Comparing the Effects of Standard Rehabilitation Protocol and Standard Rehabilitation Protocol in Combination with Exercise Therapy in Subjects with Acute Low Back Pain

Comparing the Effects of Standard Rehabilitation Protocol and Standard Rehabilitation Protocol in Combination with Exercise Therapy, on Functional Disability and Pain in Subjects Affected by Non Specific Low Back Pain

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2016080620888N6
Enrollment
40
Registered
2016-10-18
Start date
2015-04-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Nonspecific Low Back Pain. Low Back Pain

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention Group: this group will receive standard treatment including education to stay active, self-management, lumbar school (a pamphlet is used), manipulation in the first two se
Rehabilitation
Intervention Group: this group will receive standard treatment including education to stay active, self-management, lumbar school (a pamphlet is used), manipulation in the first two sessions and 30 mi
Control Group: this group will receive standard treatment including education to stay active, self-management, lumbar school (a pamphlet is used), manipulation in the first two sessions and 30 minutes

Sponsors

Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Vice Chancellory of Research and Technology
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 55 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion Criteria: meeting at least 5 items of following items: remaining pain even after 7 days of treatment; pain duration less than 6 weeks; no symptoms distal to the knee; one or more hypo-mobile segments in the lumbar spines; Oswestry disability score = 25%; pain intensity = 30% (Visual Analogue Scale). Exclusion criteria: spine fracture/surgery in the previous 6 months; pregnancy; neoplasia; infection of the spine; visceral pain; systemic disorders; radicular pain due to radiculopathy in last 6 months; sensory impairments; abnormal deep tendon reflexes or muscular weakness due to nerve compression; neurological claudication; psychiatric disorders; osteoporosis; corticosteroid therapy; receiving spinal manipulation previously for the same LBP episode; back pain; segmental spinal instability; administering narcotics; those who may not cooperate; those with contraindications for spinal manipulation; those who meet red flag conditions like fever; trauma; unusual weight loss.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain. Timepoint: at the beginning, after first manipulation, after second manipulation, after the 8th therapeutic session, and at one month follow-up. Method of measurement: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).;Functional Disability. Timepoint: at the beginning, after the 8th therapeutic session, and at one month follow-up. Method of measurement: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Abdominal Muscle Endurance. Timepoint: at the beginning, after the 8th therapeutic session, and at one month follow-up. Method of measurement: Shirado Test.;Back Muscle endurance. Timepoint: at the beginning, after the 8th therapeutic session, and at one month follow-up. Method of measurement: Sorensen Test.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Zahra Sadat Rezaeian

Muscoloskeletal Research Center, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences,

zrezaeian@yahoo.com; zrezaeian@rehab.mui.ac.ir00983137925012; 00983137925042

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026