The effect of trunk balance exercises and whole body vibration on the low back pain.

The comparison of trunk balance exercises and whole body vibration on the postural control of the patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT2016072229029N1

Enrollment

Registered

2016-09-06

Start date

2016-09-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

low back pain. low back pain

Interventions

Intervention 1: In balance training group intervention consists of 18 sessions,3 times and 6 weeks. Modalities ( TENS : low frequency=1-4 Hz, duration =100-400 micro sec, amplitude as tolerated, hot

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

20 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with chronic non-specific low back pain longer than four months duration Pain severity according to a numerical rating scale (NRS) between 3 and 7 Functional disability with a score greater than 8 on the Persian version of the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (PRMDQ)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Any dysfunctional entrapment of the nerve roots or history of radicular pain Leg length discrepancy A?ny history of hip or knee surgery ?Ankle or foot problems History of lower extremity orthopedic surgery Chronic ankle instability Vestibular and neurological disease Any uncorrected auditory or visual impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Dynamic balance. Timepoint: Baseline, End of study. Method of measurement: Y- balance test.;Static balance. Timepoint: Baseline, End of study. Method of measurement: Single leg stance test.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Differences of thickness of TrA, Internal oblique, External obliqe and multifidus muscles bilaterally. Timepoint: Baseline, End of study. Method of measurement: Rehabilitation Ultrasonography Imaging.;Pain intensity. Timepoint: Baseline, End of study, One month after the end of study. Method of measurement: Visual Analog Scale( VAS).;Functional disability. Timepoint: Baseline, End of study, One month after the end of study. Method of measurement: Persian version of the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (PRMDQ).;Differences of cross sectional area of multifidus muscle bilaterally. Timepoint: Baseline, End of study. Method of measurement: Rehabilitative Ultrasonography Imaging.	—

Measure

Time frame

Differences of thickness of TrA, Internal oblique, External obliqe and multifidus muscles bilaterally. Timepoint: Baseline, End of study. Method of measurement: Rehabilitation Ultrasonography Imaging.;Pain intensity. Timepoint: Baseline, End of study, One month after the end of study. Method of measurement: Visual Analog Scale( VAS).;Functional disability. Timepoint: Baseline, End of study, One month after the end of study. Method of measurement: Persian version of the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (PRMDQ).;Differences of cross sectional area of multifidus muscle bilaterally. Timepoint: Baseline, End of study. Method of measurement: Rehabilitative Ultrasonography Imaging.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactFarahnaz Emami

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

emamif@sums.ac.ir+98 71 3628 9269

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026