Skip to content

The effect of education on Knowledge & performance on nurses

The Comparative study of effect of teach back, concept map & lecture method on Knowledge & performance of Hemovigilance processes on nurses

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20160719028997N1
Enrollment
108
Registered
2019-05-18
Start date
2019-06-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemovigilance education.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: First intervention group: In this group, hemovigilance training is done in a feedback-based approach in two two-hour sessions in selected sections based on a bookle

Sponsors

Iran University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Have a graduate degree in nursing or higher Has not participated in Hemovigilance training courses Willing to participate in the study and complete the informed consent form Have at least six months experience in the current section An official, contractual, corporate, design or contractor

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: participated in the Hemovigilance period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The purpose of this study is to be able to memorize and teach the subjects taught about hemovigilance. Timepoint: Before the intervention and 14 days later. Method of measurement: This ability is provided by a questionnaire of 32 questions( RBTKQ) is measured. In this tool, the correct answer belongs to the score one questions and the wrong answer to zero score. The minimum and maximum score is 0 to 32. In this tool, earning a score of zero and equal to 50% of the total score (score of 0-16) indicates weak knowledge, the score of 51% to 75% of the total score (score of 17-24) represents average knowledge and more than 75% (score of 25-32) Expresses good knowledge.;Function: The purpose of this study is to properly evaluate the process of blood transfusion and its products during the three prior periods, during and after transfusion. Timepoint: Before the intervention and 14 days later. Method of measurement: Collecting performance information through the self-declaration checklist is carried out on 20 questions. Questions with the five Likert Options scale are never up to ever, with a score of zero to four. In this tool, the minimum and maximum points are zero to 80 and earn less points and equal to 75% poor score (0-60), average score 90-76% (61-72). More than 90% is considered good (73-80).

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDaryadokht Masror-Roodsari

Iran University of Medical Sciences

Masror.d@iums.ac.ir+98 21 8888 2885

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026