Skip to content

Effect of amniotic membrane in reduction of postoperative complications after impacted mandibular third molar surgery

Effect of amniotic membrane in reduction of postoperative complications after impacted mandibular third molar surgery

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2016071228892N1
Enrollment
26
Registered
2016-10-02
Start date
2016-09-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Correlation between complications associated with impacted mandibular third molar surgery and amniotic membrane.

Interventions

Intervention 1: In this study, side of mandible in which amniotic membrane is applied, is considered treatment group and would be selected randomly for each patient. Surgical removal of contralateral
Treatment - Other
In this study, side of mandible in which amniotic membrane is applied, is considered treatment group and would be selected randomly for each patient. Surgical removal of contralateral wisdom tooth wou
Contralateral side is considered control.

Sponsors

Hamadan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
16 Years to 64 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: taking no medications and drugs; healthy patients with ASA 1 category; lack of allergy to local anesthesia; having bilateral mandibular third molar with similar impaction Exclusion criteria: poor oral hygiene; hypersensitivity to amniotic membrane; smoking and alcohol abuse; pregnant and lactating mothers

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain. Timepoint: days 2 , 5 , 8. Method of measurement: VAS scale.;Swelling. Timepoint: days 2 , 5 , 8. Method of measurement: Sum of 3 distances: 1- tragus to oral commisure; 2- lateral canthus to mandibular angle; 3- tragus to pogonion.;Trismus. Timepoint: days 2 , 5 , 8. Method of measurement: Maximum opening measured between upper and lower incisors.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient satisfaction. Timepoint: days 2, 5, 8. Method of measurement: based on planned scale.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactOmid Soltaninia

Dental School

omid.soltaninia@umsha.ac.ir+98 81 3838 1058

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026