Skip to content

Patency comparison between two different kind of vascular accesses in hemodialysis patients.

Comparison of vascular patency in basilic vein transposition compared to straight 6-mm grafts, as upper arm vascular access, in hemodialysis patients.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2016070726023N1
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-10-13
Start date
2016-07-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Renal Failure. Chronic kidney disease, stage 5

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group 1: in order to creating dialysis vascular access, surgical operation will be done to perform basilic vein transposition. In this group after explore and superficiali
Treatment - Surgery
Intervention group 1: in order to creating dialysis vascular access, surgical operation will be done to perform basilic vein transposition. In this group after explore and superficialisation of the b
Intervention group 2: Surgical operation for creating brachioaxillary prosthetic 6 mm graft between axillary vein and brachial artery. In this group after axillary vein and brachial artery exploration

Sponsors

Vice chancellor for research of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
30 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Patients Suffering end stage renal diseases with no possibility of creating the radiocephalic or brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis or they already have fistula but it has been damaged and unusable; No previous Basilic vein transposition or arteriovenous graft in the site of operation; No history of current medication with anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents; Age 30-80 years old. Exclusion criteria: Anticoagulant or antiplatelet treatment after surgery and during follows up; cease hemodialysis from the created access after the operation for any reason.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Access patency time. Timepoint: 2 weeks, 1, 2, 3, 6 months then every 3 months after surgery up to one year. Method of measurement: Observation for finding the evidence of created access obstruction or successful dialysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Presence of a palpable thrill in created access. Timepoint: 2 weeks, 1, 2, 3, 6 months then every 3 months after surgery up to one year. Method of measurement: Dialysis Access physical examination for thrill strength and consistency.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr Pouya Tayebi

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

tayebip941@mums.ac.ir+98 51 3841 2088

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026