Skip to content

CPR Competency: Developing, implementing, and evaluating a flipped classroom teaching method

Developing, implementing, and evaluating a flipped classroom teaching method on CPR competency among medical emergency students

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20160625028627N2
Enrollment
102
Registered
2023-05-26
Start date
2023-10-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CPR Competency.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Blended learning CPR education: The blended learning CPR education program is designed as an eight-session program. • In Session 1, program orientation, will be giv

Sponsors

Sanandaj University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: People were chosen to participate in this study if they are Iranian Being the undergraduate Medical Emergency students admitted to the Department of Emergency Medical Sciences, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran Being able to access the online learning environment Passed first aid or CPR exam

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Unwilling to participate in this study Being unable or unwilling to access online resources Being first year students

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
CPR competency. Timepoint: Study outcomes will be measured at baseline, 8 and 12 weeks post intervention. Method of measurement: Professional Competency (MINI-CEX) It is a method of evaluation to assess the clinical skills of students through direct observation and provide constructive feedback. The mini-CEX checklist consists of 40 items with seven components area has been scored between 1 up 9 in each question of skills 'parts (in which 1–3 was “unsatisfactory,” 4–6 were “satisfactory,” and 7–9 were “above expected”), with a total score from 40 to 360. A higher score means the higher professional competency of nursing students. The seven different skill competency parts for evaluation of the student's professional skill competency such as; Nursing communication skills and history taking, physical examination skills, Nursing professionalism, Nursing intervention &clinical judgment, capabilities to provide Consultation / Health Education to patients and family, organization/efficacy, general nursing clinical competency.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
CPR Knowledge. Timepoint: The study outcome will be measured at baseline, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention. Method of measurement: A 10-item, multiple-choice questionnaire for the evaluation of theoretical knowledge will be used. The examiner will rate the participants’ actions based on the sequence of steps on the 10-item checklist for practical evaluation. Points will be given for actions performed correctly in sequence, and for the effectiveness and quality of chest compressions. Higher scores indicate better knowledge.;CPR Clinical Skills. Timepoint: The study outcome will be measured at baseline, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention. Method of measurement: The skill test will be rated based on a checklist representing the performance guidelines set by the American Heart Association using low-fidelity human simulation. The tests for CPR skills will be completed by the researchers, who observed the students individually. All students will be evaluated on the same mock code situation for the skill test. The possible range of scores for each test was 0 to 25. Each student received 1 point for each of the skills they performed correctly and in the correct order; no points were granted for not performing the skill, performing in the incorrect order, or performing incorrectly.;Clinical Performance. Timepoint: The study outcome will be measured at baseline, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention. Method of measurement: A 20-item checklist for the evaluation of practical performance will be used. Participants will be reassessed individually for their practical performance by examiners, blinded to group assignment, and rate the participants’ actions on a 20-min simulated scenario of cardiac arrest using a CPR training manikin. The checklist rating form is comprised of 20 items in three categories: leadership, teamwork, and team member skills. The checklist rating scores range from 1 to 5 for each item. A score of 1 is the lowest score and a score of 5 is the highest score. The

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactGolnaz Azami

Sanandaj University of Medical Sciences

golnaz.azami64@gmail.com+98 918 344 6450

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026