Skip to content

dry needling efficacy in patients on pain and function of patient with patellofemoral pain syndrome

Comparison of ischemic compression and dry needling as trigger point therapy for patellofemoral pain syndrome in young adults: A double-blind randomized clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2016062028542N1
Enrollment
54
Registered
2017-03-08
Start date
2017-05-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

patellofemoral pain syndrome. Other soft tissue disorders related to use, overuse and pressure

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group 1: ischemic compression: Treatment in this group involves applying tolerably painful, persistent manual pressure (usually with the thumb) against the tissue barrier
Rehabilitation
Intervention group 1: ischemic compression: Treatment in this group involves applying tolerably painful, persistent manual pressure (usually with the thumb) against the tissue barrier of the MTrP. Th
Intervention group 2: dry needling: the needle was inserted perpendicularly through the skin over the MTrP area, using the fast-in and fast-out technique and moved forward until a local twitch respon

Sponsors

investigator
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 30 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The inclusion criteria are: 1) reported pain of more than 6 weeks’ duration in at least two of the following situations: patellar compression, squatting, prolonged sitting, walking, stair climbing, isometric quadriceps contraction (Crossley K et al 2002; Whittingham M et al 2004; Iverson et al 2008); 2) reported pain in one of the following tests: vastus medialis coordination test, patellar apprehension test, eccentric step test (Nijs J et al 2006); 3) presence of at least one MTrP in the VMO of the symptomatic knee (pressure applied to the VMO produced pain); 4) Kujala questionnaire score between 40 and 70, and visual analog scale (VAS) score greater than 40. Volunteers will exclud if they had a history of any of the following: ligamentous insufficiency of the knee, meniscus damage, patellar subluxation or dislocation, nerve root compression, spine or lower extremity surgery, any systemic, orthopedic or neurological disorder, or current physical therapy (Iverson CA et al. 2008; Hains G and Hains F 2010; Grindstaff TL et al 2012).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain. Timepoint: before treatment, 1 week after treatment, 1 month after treatment, 3 months after treatment. Method of measurement: NPRS.;PPT. Timepoint: before treatment, 1 week after treatment, 1 month after treatment, 3 months after treatment. Method of measurement: digital algometry.;Functional status. Timepoint: before treatment, 1 week after treatment, 1 month after treatment, 3 months after treatment. Method of measurement: kujala questionnaire.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactShabnam Behrangrad

Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences

dbehrang@gmail.com+98 911 255 3309

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026