Skip to content

Effect of asymmetric prosthetesis on the dynamic stability of amputees

Dynamic stability of unilateral above knee amputees using asymmetric prosthesis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20160606028310N4
Enrollment
15
Registered
2018-01-21
Start date
2017-02-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Unilateral above knee amputation. Traumatic amputation at level between hip and knee

Interventions

Intervention 1: Moving knee mass down by 36.7 % of the total shank length, 68% decrease in the prosthetic shank mass, 7.3% increase in the prosthetic thigh mass. Intervention 2: Moving knee mass down
Rehabilitation
Moving knee mass down by 36.7 % of the total shank length, 68% decrease in the prosthetic shank mass, 7.3% increase in the prosthetic thigh mass
Moving knee mass down by 18.35 % of the total shank length, 68% decrease in the prosthetic shank mass, 7.3% increase in the prosthetic thigh mass
17% increase in the prosthetic thigh mass, 38% decrease in the prosthetic shank mass
Without modification

Sponsors

Vice Chancellor for Research and Technology
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subjects with unilateral above knee amputation Independent community ambulation with prosthesis without assistance device Age between 20 to 60 years Using prosthesis at least 3 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Using medications that may limit the subject's ability to walk. Diabetes or Cardiopulmonary disorders. Neurological disorders. History of lower extremities surgery or orthopedic disorders other than amputation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Dynamic stability. Timepoint: Immediate afte intervention. Method of measurement: ?Accelerometer (GaitUp).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Symmetry indices of walking (SI). Timepoint: Immediately after intervention. Method of measurement: Accelerometer (GaitUp).;Prefered walking speed. Timepoint: Immediately after intervention. Method of measurement: 2- minute walking test (2MWT).;Subject preference. Timepoint: Immediately after intervention. Method of measurement: The subject will be asked to rank the modified prostheses of the four conditions in order of their preferences.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Mohammad Ali Sanjari

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences

sanjarima@alum.sharif.edu+98 21 2222 8051

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026