Skip to content

evaluation of ethanol wet bonding technique on sensitivity level of composite restoration

Evaluation of the Effect of Ethanol Wet Bonding Technique on Postoperative Sensitivity of Posterior Class 2 Resin Composite Restorations in premolar teeth

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2016060228218N1
Enrollment
24
Registered
2016-09-27
Start date
2016-08-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

evaluation of post op sensitivity.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Control group (conventional): after drying the cavity for 5 s with oil-water free air spray, Adper Single Bond 2 Nano adhesive system was applied to the entire preparation’s surface in
Treatment - Other
Control group (conventional): after drying the cavity for 5 s with oil-water free air spray, Adper Single Bond 2 Nano adhesive system was applied to the entire preparation’s surface in accordance with
Ethanol-wet bonding/hydrophobic adhesive: the same sequence as group 2, but Margin Bond as hydrophobic adhesive was applied to the entire preparation’s surface in accordance with manufacturer’s instr
Ethanol-wet bonding group/hydrophilic adhesive: after drying the cavity with cotton-wool, the dentin surface was treated with a series of increasing ethanol concentration: 70%, 80%, 90% , two 100% for

Sponsors

Vice chancellor for research of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 35 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The inclusion criteria: Patients who have at least three premolars with a class 2 cavity (MO, DO) on each and they can be isolated; After elimination of carious tissue, the gingival margins of all cavities should be placed 1.0 mm above the cemento-enamel junction, 1-1.5 mm in axial depth and ½-2/3 of inter cuspal space in width; The restorative procedure can be performed without need to direct/indirect pulp treatment. The exclusion criteria: Patients exhibiting severe to moderate periodontitis; untreated periodontal disease; uncontrolled caries; marginal recession of the tooth; very poor oral hygiene; heavy occlusal forces such as bruxism and clenching; xerostomia; patients with removable prosthesis or orthodontics appliances or receiving bleaching treatments or ?uoride supplements. Prior to treatment, A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is used to assess the patients' opinions toward sensitivity and those with moderate to severe sensitivity (Score 3=) are excluded from the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Post op sensititvity to cold stimuli. Timepoint: 1,3,7,14 and 30 days post op. Method of measurement: using VAS (Visual Analoge Scale).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Post op sensititvity to cold stimuli. Timepoint: in 1,3,7,14,30 days. Method of measurement: using VAS (Visual Analoge Scale).

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactYegane Khazaei

Mashhad dental school

khazaeiy891@mums.ac.ir+98 51 3822 7323

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026