Skip to content

Comparison of cardiovascular response to laryngeal mask airway versus tracheal intubation

Comparative evaluation of Laryngeal mask insertion with conventional tracheal intubation on cardiovascular response during general anesthesia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2016052712123N6
Enrollment
82
Registered
2016-06-18
Start date
2016-06-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Condition 1: Humerus fracture. Condition 2: Fracture of both ulna and radius. Condition 3: Fracture at wrist and hand level. Condition 4: Leg fracture. Condition 5: Appendectomy. Condition 6: Inguinal hernia. Fracture of shaft of humerus, Fracture of lower end of humerus Fracture of lower end of both ulna and radius, Multiple fractures of forearm, Fracture of other parts of forearm Fracture of navicular [scaphoid] bone of hand, Fracture of other carpal bone(s), Fracture of first metacarpal bo

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: After induction of anesthesia and muscle relaxation size 3 unique singe use LMA for women and size 4 for men will be inserted cuff pressure adjusts by cuff pressure
Treatment - Devices
Intervention group: After induction of anesthesia and muscle relaxation size 3 unique singe use LMA for women and size 4 for men will be inserted cuff pressure adjusts by cuff pressure manometer.
Control group: After induction of anesthesia and muscle relaxation laryngoscopy and intubation with size 7.5 cuffed tracheal tube for women and size 8.0 for men will be done and cuff pressure adjusts

Sponsors

Deputy of research, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 45 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: male or female; 20-45 years old; ASA class 1 or 2 (anesthesia risk ); elective limbs open surgery; hernia; appendectomy. Exclusion criteria: Patient's refusal; hypertension; antihypertensive medication; opiate and analgesic drug abuse; every anesthesia or surgical complication.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Systolic blood pressure. Timepoint: before anesthesia, after induction, during airway control(laryngoscopy and intubation in control group and LMA insertion in intervention group), every five minutes during operation. Method of measurement: mmHg by Novin saadat's monitoring.;Pulse rate. Timepoint: before anesthesia, after induction, during airway control(laryngoscopy and intubation in control group and LMA insertion in intervention group), every five minutes during operation. Method of measurement: Beat per minutes by Novin saadat's monitoring.;Diastolic blood pressure. Timepoint: before anesthesia, after induction, during airway control(laryngoscopy and intubation in control group and LMA insertion in intervention group), every five minutes during operation. Method of measurement: mmHg by Novin saadat's monitoring.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative sore throat. Timepoint: At the end of recovery and 4 hours after in ward. Method of measurement: 0-3 scoring system 0-none 1- mild 2-moderate 3- severe.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactJavad Nourian MD

Imam Hossein Hospital, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran

javadnourian@shmu.ac.ir+98 23 3234 2001

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026