Comparison of postoperative surgical-resection of perinea outcomes with pessary insertion in patients with prolapse of stage III pelvic organs.

A Comparative Study of Clinical outcomes of Le Fort and placing the Pessary for Patients with Pelvic Prolapse.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20160521027998N6

Enrollment

102

Registered

2019-01-15

Start date

2018-10-04

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP). Complete uterovaginal prolapse

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: In this group, with the Le Fort surgery, the vaginal mucus was sutured in the anterior-posterior plane and in fact, there is a kind of vaginal blockage that prevent

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Age

45 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women with the severe genital prolapse (stage 3 and above)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Evaluation of pelvic floor. Timepoint: On entering the study and 6 months after treatment. Method of measurement: Based on Pelvic Floor Disability Index(PFDI-20) questionnaire.;?sexual function. Timepoint: On entering the study and 6 months after treatment. Method of measurement: Based on the female sexual function index questionnaire( FSFI).	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
The need for surgery six months after treatment. Timepoint: Six months after treatment. Method of measurement: Clinical examination and questioning of the patient's symptoms.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactElham Gholamian

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences

sepandar.print2016@gmail.com+98 31 3236 7001

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026