Comparison of two surgical techniques for treatment of calcaneal fracture.

Comparison between conventional and minimally invasive technique for treatment of calcaneal fracture.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT2016051327872N1

Enrollment

Registered

2017-07-17

Start date

2017-07-23

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Calcaneos fracture. Fracture of calcaneus

Interventions

Intervention 1: In the intervention group calcaneal fracture will operate through the minimally invasive approach by using a 3 centimeter incision on sinus tarsi. After exposing the articular surface

Treatment - Surgery

In the intervention group calcaneal fracture will operate through the minimally invasive approach by using a 3 centimeter incision on sinus tarsi. After exposing the articular surface by removing the

In the control group the surgery will perform using a large L type incision on the lateral aspect of the ankle and soft tissues including peroneal tendons will subperiosteally retract anteriorly the f

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

17 Years to 74 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion critaria: calcaneal close fracture; age more tha 18 years and less than 75 years , exclusion critaria: open calcaneal fracture; no indication for surgical treatment; uncontrolled systemic diseases; simultanous foot fracture

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
AOFAS score. Timepoint: 6 months and one year later. Method of measurement: Filling the questionaire.;Wound dehiscence. Timepoint: During three weeks after the surgery. Method of measurement: Visit the surgical wound.;Wound infection. Timepoint: During 3 weeks after the surgery. Method of measurement: Purulent discharge and culture of discharge.;VAS scorer. Timepoint: 6 months and one year after the surgery. Method of measurement: Filling the questionaire.;SF36. Timepoint: 6 months and one year after the surgery. Method of measurement: Filling the questionaire.;Accuracy of reduction. Timepoint: The day after surgery and one year later. Method of measurement: Measurement of the Bohler's and Gissane angles on lateral radiograph and articular surface reduction on coronal CT scan of the ankle.	—

Measure

Time frame

AOFAS score. Timepoint: 6 months and one year later. Method of measurement: Filling the questionaire.;Wound dehiscence. Timepoint: During three weeks after the surgery. Method of measurement: Visit the surgical wound.;Wound infection. Timepoint: During 3 weeks after the surgery. Method of measurement: Purulent discharge and culture of discharge.;VAS scorer. Timepoint: 6 months and one year after the surgery. Method of measurement: Filling the questionaire.;SF36. Timepoint: 6 months and one year after the surgery. Method of measurement: Filling the questionaire.;Accuracy of reduction. Timepoint: The day after surgery and one year later. Method of measurement: Measurement of the Bohler's and Gissane angles on lateral radiograph and articular surface reduction on coronal CT scan of the ankle.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Non-union. Timepoint: 6 months and one year after the surgery. Method of measurement: On the plain radiographs and CT scan of the ankle.;Malunion. Timepoint: 6 months and one year after the surgery. Method of measurement: Using plane radiographs and CT scan of the ankle.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sayyed Hadi Sayyed Hosseinian

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

hoseinianh@mums.ac.ir+98 51 3859 6606

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026