Comparison outcome of unstable fractures of the distal radius bone between the two surgical methods of unstable fractures of the distal radius bone between the two surgical methods

Outcomes of unstable intera articular distal radius fracture using closed reduction, percutaneous pinning and plaster cast compared with closed reduction and plaster cast in patient older than 65 years

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20160508027797N4

Enrollment

Registered

2019-03-11

Start date

2018-12-30

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Distal radius fracture. Fracture of lower end of radius

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: In patients reduction and casting, closed reduction of fracture with in the first 24 hours and then by stretching and manipulation under general anesthesia for clos

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

65 Years to 95 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age 65-95 years Patients with closed fractures and intra-articular distal radius that needed to be fixed surgery Informed consent of patient in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Surgery on wrist Severe underlying disease Lack of timely referral for follow-up therapy to the orthopedic clinic

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Range of motion of wrist. Timepoint: Immediately after surgery, then the three and the sixth and the forty- second weeks after surgery. Method of measurement: Through the examination with handheld goniometer.;Determination Radio graphic parameters. Timepoint: Immediately after surgery, then the thre e and the sixth and the forty- second weeks after surgery. Method of measurement: Measurement reference markers in the radiographic image.	—

Measure

Time frame

Range of motion of wrist. Timepoint: Immediately after surgery, then the three and the sixth and the forty- second weeks after surgery. Method of measurement: Through the examination with handheld goniometer.;Determination Radio graphic parameters. Timepoint: Immediately after surgery, then the thre e and the sixth and the forty- second weeks after surgery. Method of measurement: Measurement reference markers in the radiographic image.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Pain severity. Timepoint: Forty-second weeks after surgery. Method of measurement: By Visual Analogous Scale questionnaire.;Pin tract infection. Timepoint: Three weeks after surgery. Method of measurement: Observation.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Masoud Bahrami Ferydoni

Babol University of Medical Sciences

Drbahrami865@gmail.com+98 11 3225 6285

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026