Horizontal Neck Lines.
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention 1: Intervention group: The patients who endolift laser will be used for neck wrinkles. Laser endolift with characteristics (EUFOTON, Via Flavia 23/1 - 34148 Trieste (TS) Italy) with sett
Sponsors
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Age range 40 to 65 years Evaluation of wrinkles by a doctor and confirmation of the patient's cosmetic intervention candidate All participants provided oral as well as written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Pregnancy and breastfeeding Neuromuscular failure Hypersensitivity to Botox or laser infection
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Timepoint: 3 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Assessment by the researcher (physician) - Modified Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Six different levels of aesthetic improvement, ranging from “Very Much Improved” to “Very Much Worse.” Each of these ratings has a corresponding description in the “Description” column, which explains the degree of improvement or worsening in appearance.Here’s a brief summary of the table: Very Much Improved: Optimal cosmetic result from this procedure in this subject Much Improved: Marked improvement in appearance from the initial condition, but not completely optimal for this subject Improved: Obvious improvement in appearance from the initial condition No Change: The appearance is essentially the same as the original condition Worse: The appearance is worse than the original condition Much Worse: The appearance is much worse than the original condition Very Much Worse: The appearance is very much worse than the original condition. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The Wrinkle and Elastosis. Timepoint: At the beginning of the study, 3 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Assessment by the researcher (physician) - The Fitzpatrick Wrinkle and Elastosis Scale (FWES) is a clinical tool used to assess the severity of wrinkles. It has been modified over time to improve its reliability and applicability.The Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale (MFWS) is a validated measurement tool for nasolabial wrinkle severity assessment. It comprises three main classes and three interclasses, with definitions based on a set of reference photographs and descriptions. The scale has demonstrated good inter- and intra-assessor reliability.The FWES, on the other hand, categorizes wrinkle and elastosis severity into three levels: Mild (1-3): Fine texture changes with subtly accentuated skin lines Moderate (4-6): Distinct papular elastosis (individual papules with yellow translucency under direct lighting) and dyschromia Severe (7-9): Multipapular and confluent elastosis (thickened, yellow and pallid) approaching or consistent with cutis rhomboidalis3These scales are used in clinical settings to assess the effectiveness of treatments for wrinkles and other signs of skin aging. They provide a standardized method for quantifying wrinkle depth and severity, which is crucial for evaluating the efficacy of cosmetic techniques and treatments.;Wrinkles. Timepoint: Assessment by the researcher (physician). Method of measurement: Assessment by the researcher (physician) - 5-point wrinkle grading scale - The Score column lists numbers from 0 to 4, each representing a different level of wrinkle severity. The Description column provides details for each score: Score 0 (none): “No wrinkles.” Score 1 (mild): “Fine wrinkles; continuous skin line.” Score 2 (moderate): “Visible wrinkles and slight indentation.” Score 3 (severe): “Clearly visible wrinkles.” Score 4 (extreme): “Deep and furrowed wrinkles” and also includes the phrase “Extremely deep and lon | — |
Countries
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Contacts
Public ContactMohammad Malekan
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
Outcome results
None listed